Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITR Filing 2026: Section 143(1) Tax Demand Explained Reasons, Solutions, and How to Avoid Penalties & Disputes
 ITR Filing 2026: Over 3 Crore Income Tax Returns Filed for AY 2026 27 Income Tax Department Urges Taxpayers to Avoid Last-Minute Rush
 ITR Filing 2026: CBDT Upgrades Income Tax Portal Ahead of July 31 Deadline Key Changes Every Taxpayer Should Know
 Sold house for ₹1.10 crore, tax computed on ₹1.96 crore? ITAT explains when Section 54 relief is still available
 ITR 2026: How Taxpayers Earning 25 Lakh to 1 Crore Can Save Up to 1.5 Lakh Under the New Tax Regime
 Old vs New Tax Regime 2026: Which Saves More Tax If You Earn 13 Lakh?
  Presumptive Taxation in 2026 Rebate Losses & Deductions Practical Impact of the Income Tax Act 2025
 Income Tax Penalties Explained (2026): What Happens If You Under-Report Income or Miss Your ITR Filing

Vodafone challenges courts tax ruling in SC
September, 15th 2010

Vodafone Group has filed an appeal with the Indian Supreme Court challenging a recent decision of the Bombay High Court which said that it had to pay tax on a transaction in which Hong Kong-based Hutchison had sold an equity stake in an Indian telecom company to it.

The appeal challenges the recent High Court judgement on the issue of jurisdiction. Vodafone remains convinced that there is no tax to pay on the Hutchison transaction and we will continue to defend this position vigorously, said a statement issued by the company. Just a week ago, the Bombay High Court ruled that the Indian tax authority had jurisdiction to tax Vodafones $11 billion purchase of controlling interest in Vodafone Essar, then known as Hutchison Essar.

The Income Tax Department had issued a show cause notice to Vodafone in 2007, saying that it should have withheld tax when it cleared payments to Hutchison. The UK-based global telecom giant subsequently filed a petition against this in Mumbai.

The case was heard in 2008, and in December that year, the High court dismissed Vodafones petition. The company then appealed this in the Supreme Court, that sent the matter back to High Court to establish whether the Indian tax department has jurisdiction on the transaction.

Senior lawyer, Harish Salve, who was representing Vodafone had said at the time of the most recent Bombay High Court ruling, that the company would file an appeal soon. The estimated tax liability on the transaction is $2 billion. While the High Court judgement that said there was jurisdiction because at least part of the transaction has direct linkage to India, it did not specify the amount of tax due.

Vodafone argues that the transaction took place overseas, through arms set up in tax havens. Besides, the existing tax norms do not say that such transactions are taxable, unlike the Direct Tax Code that will come into effect from April 2012. Therefore, the company says it should be exempted of tax.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting