« Top Headlines » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  Mock Test Papers Series - I & II for Students appearing in CA Foundation January 2027 Examination.  Income Tax Rules 2026: CBDT Introduces Revised Form 161 for Penalty Waiver, Clarifies Misreporting Categories and Taxpayer Relief  ITR Filing and Income Tax Audit Deadline Extended: 5 Critical Things Taxpayers Must Know  Filing Belated ITR for AY 2026-27? Know Which Losses You Can Carry Forward and Which You May Lose  CBDT Extends Tax Audit Report Deadline to October 21, ITR Filing Last Date to November 21 for AY 2026-27  CBDT Extends AY 2026-27 ITR Filing Deadline for Tax-Audit Cases: New Dates and Key Compliance Details  Foreign Assets Missing From Your ITR? Income Tax Department Opens One-Time Disclosure Window  Tax Audit Deadline September 30: Why AIS, TDS and GST Figures May Not Match Your ITR and What Taxpayers Should Do  Tax audit deadline September 30: Common mistakes taxpayers should avoid  Your ITR says ‘verified’, but the refund hasn’t arrived? 5 reasons why your money could be stuck  Missed the ITR Deadline but TDS Refund Is Due? Here’s How You Can Still Claim Your Money «  EU plans tax law changes to hone competitive edge... Auditors wary of appointment leeway... » SC issues notices to I-T in Morgan BPO case September, 19th 2006 The spotlight is again on the issue of taxation of business process outsourcing (BPO) units in the country. The Supreme Court on Monday issued notices to the income tax department in the Morgan Stanley BPO case. A decision by the court, either way, will decide whether income tax authorities will have the right to tax BPOs of multi-national companies. In this case, Morgan Stanley had obtained an advance ruling from an arm of the tax department, the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), that outsourcing carried out by its Indian subsidiary did not constitute a permanent establishment. AAR is a quasi-judicial body, set up to give opinion to guide companies on their potential tax liabilities. The AAR ruling meant that the company would not have to pay corporate tax in India on a portion of its profit, provided that the BPO and the overseas parent did not violate fair pricing norms or arms length pricing. But the income tax department challenged the ruling and Morgan filed a cross appeal against it. The court will now hear both the appeals together on whether they can be admitted or not. However, no fresh date has been fixed for the hearing as yet, Jai Savla, counsel for Morgan Stanley said. Morgan Stanley has a captive BPO in India Morgan Stanley Advantage Services (MSAS) which provides support services IT and research.