Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 ITAT grants relief to Atos India Assessment framed for Non-Existent Authority is null & Void
 Capital Gain Deduction claim can be invoked during Re-Assessment if Assessee failed to file Returns: ITAT
 Vodafone Idea Limited is not required to Deduct Tax u/s 194H on Prepaid SIM Cards: ITAT
 Activities performed in ‘Virtual Classrooms’ also comes under the Definition of ‘Education’: ITAT grants relief to NIIT Foundation
 Scrutiny Assessment without Notice is Defective in Law: ITAT
 No Exempt Income Received or Receivable, No Disallowance under Section 14A: ITAT
 Bonus allocated to Policyholders is not Taxable as Income from Insurance Company: ITAT
 Yahoo gets Income Tax Relief from ITAT
 ITAT upholds Addition of 12.5% for taking Bills without Delivery of Goods
 No Capital Gain Tax on Amount Received by Retiring Partner: ITNo Capital Gain Tax on Amount Received by Retiring Partner: ITATAT Read more at: https://www.taxscan.in/no-capital-gain-tax-on-amount-received-by-retiring-partner-itat/56137/
 No Section 194C TDS on Reimbursement of Vehicle Expenses: ITAT

ITAT grants relief to Atos India Assessment framed for Non-Existent Authority is null & Void
August, 20th 2020

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench held that the assessment framed for Non-Existent Authority is Void ab initio.

The assessee, Atos India Pvt. Ltd. had raised various grounds on merits of various additions/disallowances made by the AO pursuant to DRP directions the counsel for the assessee emphasizes that the assessee had raised an additional ground to vide petition stating that the assessment has been framed on a non-existing entity and accordingly is void ab initio.

The respondent authority contended that the assessee filed its return of income on November 29, 2012. The assessment order has been framed showing the name “M/s. Atos IT Solutions and Services Pvt. Ltd. Formerly Siemens Information Systems (India) Ltd., now known as Atos India Pvt. Ltd.” The DRP order mentions the assessee’s name as “Altos IT Solutions Private Limited, now merged with Atos India Pvt. Ltd., formerly Siemens Information Systems (India) Ltd.

However, the Bombay High Court approved the amalgamation on December 21, 2012, with effect from July 01, 2011. The assessee did not file any revised return of income despite the fact that time was available.

The assessee did not get the PAN and particulars of the assessee duly affected and changed in the information system of the Revenue as per the requirement by making the necessary application to the NSDL. Due to a lack of change in the particulars of PAN the Departmental system continued to issue notices and other documents in the pre-amalgamation name.

Due to a lack of change in PAN particulars and names in the departmental system the AO duly framed the order by duly incorporating the full particulars. The assessee itself paid the ITAT appeal fee in 2017 in the name of an earlier company.

The Departmental Representative reiterated that the assessee not following the due procedures for change in name and No. in the PAN details, the Assessing Officer has no option but to frame the assessment by incorporating all the particulars along with the unchanged PAN.

The tribunal consisting of a Judicial Member Pawan Singh and an Accountant Member, Shamim Yahya held that the assessment order framed by the AO in the instant case deserves to be quashed as the same is without jurisdiction, being framed on a non-existent entity. Accordingly, the additional ground raised by the assessee is allowed. Since, the entire assessment is quashed on a legal issue, the adjudication of various other grounds of merits becomes infructuous.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting