Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Tax filing: How to choose the right ITR form
 Income Tax Return: How to maximise your tax refunds while filing ITR?
 Last date for filing income tax return (ITR)
 Income Tax Return: How to get maximum tax refunds on filing ITR Check out these 5 ways!
 ITR Filing: Exemptions and deductions that senior citizens can claim for FY24
 Income tax return scrutiny: CBDT issues notification on selection of cases for tax scrutiny. Check details
 CBDT signs record number of 125 Advance Pricing Agreements in FY24
 CBDT issues guidelines for selection of cases for scrutiny, focus on tax evasion info by law enforcement agencies, note experts
 CBDT issues Guidelines and Procedure for Compulsory Selection of Income Tax Returns for Complete Scrutiny for FY 2024-2025
 Net direct tax collections exceed 2023-24 target
 Govt kicks off direct tax code revision

I-T?dilutes move to cap appeals based on monetary value
August, 22nd 2018

CBDT circular said adverse judgements on specified issues should be ‘contested on merits, notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified’

More than a month after saying it will appeal adverse tax verdicts only in cases involving sums of money above certain thresholds, the taxman has diluted the decision.

A central board of direct taxes (CBDT) circular issued to all income tax principal commissioners on 20 August said adverse judgements on specified issues should be “contested on merits, notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified”.

Accordingly, taxmen can file appeals in cases that involve foreign black money or accounts, cases challenging constitutional validity of IT Act provisions, where rules issued by the tax department were held to be illegal, cases involving additions based on inputs received from other investigative agencies, or where the tax department has initiated prosecution.

Mint has seen a copy of the note.

In July, the government decided to increase the monetary threshold for filing appeals in tax disputes in various courts and decided to withdraw many pending appeals to reduce litigation and improve ease of doing business.

The monetary threshold for filing appeals in tribunals handling income tax as well as customs, excise and service tax disputes was doubled from ?10 lakh to ?20 lakh.

In the case of high courts, the monetary threshold was increased to ?50 lakh from ?20 lakh and in the Supreme Court, the threshold was increased to ?1 crore from ?25 lakh.

The government expected this to lead to withdrawal of 34% of appeals filed by the income tax department in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 48% in high courts and 54% in the Supreme Court.

The total tax amount involved in litigation was expected to reduce by ?5,600 crore, according to government estimates.

The main reason for raising the threshold was to ensure that the resources of the revenue department were utilized more selectively. The success rate of the government in these disputes has been very poor historically.

“These clauses have been inserted to give more importance to the cases involving prosecution or possible prosecution where the tax impact to the exchequer may not be significant but the offence of the person may warrant prosecution like habitual offenders, collusion in evasions, etc,” said Amit Maheshwari, Partner, Ashok Maheshwary and Associates LLP.

There were more than 88,700 cases pending in tribunals and 41,960 cases in high courts as of December 2016, according to a government statement in the parliament. There were 5,272 cases pending in the Supreme Court as of September 2016.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting