Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Govt kicks off direct tax code revision
 ITR 2024 25 Check tax department s update on TDS and refunds
 Income Tax: Why did some taxpayers receive notice for discrepancy in house rent receipt? IT Dept explains
 Income tax exemption: 4 financial instruments you can still invest into before March 31
 CBDT drops small tax demands but not TCS, TDS claims
 ITR Refund: Awaiting money from Income Tax? Here's why you have not yet received your amount
 Income Tax Notice: What to do if you receive a Section 143 (1) notice from taxman?
 Average tax return processing time cut to 10 days: CBDT
 7 types of Income Tax Notice ITR filers may receive for AY 2023-24
 ITR filing: Do these advance preparations before filing your income tax return
 What are the strategies to maximize tax refunds after submitting an income tax return (ITR)?

I-T?dilutes move to cap appeals based on monetary value
August, 22nd 2018

CBDT circular said adverse judgements on specified issues should be ‘contested on merits, notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified’

More than a month after saying it will appeal adverse tax verdicts only in cases involving sums of money above certain thresholds, the taxman has diluted the decision.

A central board of direct taxes (CBDT) circular issued to all income tax principal commissioners on 20 August said adverse judgements on specified issues should be “contested on merits, notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified”.

Accordingly, taxmen can file appeals in cases that involve foreign black money or accounts, cases challenging constitutional validity of IT Act provisions, where rules issued by the tax department were held to be illegal, cases involving additions based on inputs received from other investigative agencies, or where the tax department has initiated prosecution.

Mint has seen a copy of the note.

In July, the government decided to increase the monetary threshold for filing appeals in tax disputes in various courts and decided to withdraw many pending appeals to reduce litigation and improve ease of doing business.

The monetary threshold for filing appeals in tribunals handling income tax as well as customs, excise and service tax disputes was doubled from ?10 lakh to ?20 lakh.

In the case of high courts, the monetary threshold was increased to ?50 lakh from ?20 lakh and in the Supreme Court, the threshold was increased to ?1 crore from ?25 lakh.

The government expected this to lead to withdrawal of 34% of appeals filed by the income tax department in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 48% in high courts and 54% in the Supreme Court.

The total tax amount involved in litigation was expected to reduce by ?5,600 crore, according to government estimates.

The main reason for raising the threshold was to ensure that the resources of the revenue department were utilized more selectively. The success rate of the government in these disputes has been very poor historically.

“These clauses have been inserted to give more importance to the cases involving prosecution or possible prosecution where the tax impact to the exchequer may not be significant but the offence of the person may warrant prosecution like habitual offenders, collusion in evasions, etc,” said Amit Maheshwari, Partner, Ashok Maheshwary and Associates LLP.

There were more than 88,700 cases pending in tribunals and 41,960 cases in high courts as of December 2016, according to a government statement in the parliament. There were 5,272 cases pending in the Supreme Court as of September 2016.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting