Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITR Defective Notice for AY 2026-27: Reasons, 15-Day Deadline and What Happens If You Ignore It
 ITR Refund Status 2026: How to Track Your Income Tax Refund Online – Step-by-Step Guide
 GST Council Explores Andhra Pradesh’s AI-Driven Tax Administration Model
 ITR filing 2026: Who must file by August 31? Tax department explains
 Delhi HC Rules GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without a Clear Show Cause Notice (SCN)
 Belated income tax return AY 2026-27: How to file, late filing charges and what you may lose
 Major Financial Changes from August 1, 2026: ITR Deadline, RBI MPC Meeting, Tatkal Ticket Rules & More
 Government proposes to ease tax relief conditions for offshore funds
 TallyPrime Connected Banking: Automating Banking and Accounting
 ITR Filing Deadline 2026: Is July 31 the Last Date to File Your Income Tax Return? Latest Official Update
 ITR filing deadline nears: How to file income tax return online on e-filing portal - quick 15-step guide

Supreme Court stays levy of service tax on lawyers
August, 11th 2015

The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Bombay high court order dismissing a challenge to the levy of service tax on lawyers.

A bench comprising chief justice H.L. Dattu, justice Amitava Roy and justice Arun Mishra tagged the matter with similar petitions before the apex court. It also stayed the high court order of 15 December.

High court bar associations from Andhra Pradesh, Guwahati, Chennai and Delhi have challenged the levy of service tax on lawyers as per Section 65 of the Finance Act, 2011. This provision seeks to levy service tax on fees paid by clients to lawyers.

Within four days of its introduction, it was stayed by the Delhi high court.

The petition, a copy of which Mint has reviewed, states that the imposition of the tax is oppressive, unjust, unreasonable and ultra vires (beyond legal authority) of the right to equality and freedom to carry on a trade or profession. It argues that the relationship between a client and lawyer must not be seen as that of a service provider and a client as the lawyer is merely a representative of his client.

The petition strongly condemned the hasty manner in which the Bombay high court had addressed the issue as the levy, being in the nature of a federal tax, could not vary in various jurisdictions.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting