Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Indian Technometal Company Ltd., 1107, Vikrant Tower-4 Rajendra Place New Delhi Vs. ACIT Circle 11(1), New Delhi
August, 28th 2015
          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                DELHI BENCH "C", NEW DELHI
      Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Suchitra Kamble, JM
              ITA No. 5612/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13
Indian Technometal Company Ltd.,    Vs ACIT
1107, Vikrant Tower-4                  Circle 11(1),
Rajendra Place
New Delhi                               New Delhi
(APPELLANT)                             (RESPONDENT)
                                       PAN No. AACCI1192G
           Assessee by : None
           Revenue by : Sh. T.Vaganthan, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing : 27.08.2015       Date of Pronouncement : 27. 08.2015

                                   ORDER
Per N. K. Saini, AM:

     This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order dated
19.08.2013 of ld. CIT(A)-XV, New Delhi.






2.   Earlier this case was fixed for hearing on 09.06.2015 and
the counsel for the assessee moved an application to withdraw
the power of attorney. The case was adjourned for 27.08.2015
i.e. today and the notice for hearing was issued through
registered post on 14.07.2015 at the address mentioned in the
form no. 36/ impugned order / assessment order. However,
during the course of hearing nobody was present on behalf of
the assessee neither any adjournment was sought. It, therefore,
                                     2                ITA No. 5612/Del/2013


appears that the assessee is not interested to prosecute the
matter, since no change in address was informed.
3.    The law aids those who are vigilant, not those who sleep upon their
rights.   This   principle   is   embodied    in   well   known       dictum,
"VIGILANTIBUS          ET    NON      DORMIENTIBUS            JURA       SUB
VENIUNT'. Considering the facts and keeping in view the provisions
of rule 19(2) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules as were
considered in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 ITD
320)(Del), we treat this appeal as unadmitted.

4.    Similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High
Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT (223 ITR
480) wherein it has been held as under:

      "if the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
     appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation
     of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the
     court is not bound to answer the reference."

5.    Similarly, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of
New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the
reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was
not any assistance from the assessee.

6.    Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs.
B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that
                                        3                ITA No. 5612/Del/2013







the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but
effectively pursuing the same.

7.      So by respectfully following the view taken in the cases cited
supra, we dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.

8.       In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
 (Order Pronounced in the Court on 27/08/2015)



        Sd/-                                        Sd/-
   (Suchitra Kamble)                            (N. K. Saini)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 27 /08/2015
*Binita*
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5.DR: ITAT
                                               ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                            4                    ITA No. 5612/Del/2013


                                                     Date     Initial
1.    Draft dictated on                          27/08/2015
2.    Draft placed before author                 27/08/2015
3.    Draft proposed & placed before the
      second member
4.    Draft discussed/approved by Second
      Member.
5.    Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS
6.    Kept for pronouncement on
7.    File sent to the Bench Clerk
8.    Date on which file goes to the AR
9.    Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.
10.   Date of dispatch of Order.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting