Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

ACIT Circle-2, Meerut Vs. The Baghpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Baghpat Meerut
August, 10th 2015
                    IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                        DELHI BENCHES : "H" NEW DELHI

                   BEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT
                 AND SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                                   ITA No: 6157/Del/2012
                                       AY : - 2007-08

              ACIT               vs.             The Baghpat Co-operative Sugar
              Circle-2,                          Mills Ltd.
              Meerut                              Baghpat
                                                  Meerut
                                                 (PAN AAAT0568P)
                (Appellant)                              (Respondent)

                          Appellant by    : Shri J.P. Chandrekar, Sr. DR
                          Respondent by   :Shri P.S. Kashyap, CA

                     Date of Hearing      :29.7.2015
               Date of pronouncement      :7.8.2015


                                       ORDER

PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER



   This is an appeal filed by the revenue directed against the order of the CIT(A)

Meerut dated 4.9.2012 for the asstt. year 2007-08. The assesee is a co-operative

society   and it filed its return of income for the assessment year 2007-08 on

18.10.2007 declaring total loss at Rs. 18,48,23,232/-. The AO completed the loss of

Rs. 1,66,35,600/- disallowing the following :-


          1. Subscription to Federation      Rs. 16,29,918/-

          2. Interest to federation          Rs. 1,65,29,427/-

          3. Payment of penal interest        Rs.    3,07,922/-
                                                            ITA No.6157/Del/2012
                                         ACIT vs. The Baghpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd.






2.     Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal. The first appellate

authority allowed the appeal of the assessee.      Aggrieved the revenue is in appeal

on the following grounds :-


             1. "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld.
                Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the
                disallowance of Rs. 16,29,918/- towards subscription of UP, Co-operative
                Sugar Factories Federation Ltd. ignoring the fact that the assesee failed
                to prove the services provided by the federation for business purposes
                and the deduction was admissible under section 37 to the IT Act,1961.
             2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. Commissioner
                of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the disallowance of
                additional interest of Rs. 3,07,922/- paid to the Sugar Development Fund
                (Govt. Of India) 1991 ignoring the fact that the same was in the nature
                of penalty.
             3. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. Commissioner
                of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the disallowances of
                additional interest of Rs. 1,65,29,427/- due to be paid to Shakkar Vishesh
                Nidhi (SVN) and U.P. Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation ignoring
                the fact that the same was not paid before the filing of the return of
                income and that the disallowance was covered u/s 43B (d) of the I.T.
                Act, 1961."



3.   We have heard Shri J.P. Chandrekar, Sr. DR on behalf of the revenue and Shri

P.S. Kashyap, Ld. Counsel on behalf of the assessee.


4.   On a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and

perusal of the findings on record and the orders of the authorities below we hold as

follows.


5.   Ground No. 1 of the revenue has to be dismissed by upholding para 5.3 of the

order of the Ld. CIT (A) wherein he followed his order for the assessment year

2003-04 and allowed the claim of the assessee. In fact the AO in his order

disallowed the amount by merely following his order for the assessment year 2003-

04. The department accepted the order of the first appellate authority for the



                                                                                              2
                                                            ITA No.6157/Del/2012
                                         ACIT vs. The Baghpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd.

assessment year 2003--04. Under these circumstances we see reason to interfere in

the order of the first appellate authority, specifically as the subscription is allowable

u/s 37 (1) of the Act. The amount paid as subscription to federation is necessary

business expenditure. The necessity / requirement of incurring this expenditure is

explained. Hence this ground is dismissed.


6.     The second issue is disallowance of interest paid to federation. The AO

disallowed the amount on the ground that the payment of interest is outside the

purview of business of the assessee. Ld. CIT(A) gave a finding that the assessee

has taken loan from Govt. of India and UP Government, for the purpose of business,

and that this is evident from the sanctioned letters and hence the interest in

question is allowable u/s 36(1). We have seen reason to interfere in this finding of

the first appellate authority . The revenue has raised a legal argument that, the

interest in question cannot be allowed, as it is hit by the provisions of section 43B(d)

of the Act.


7.      Section 43B(d) of the Act reads as follows :-


     d)       "any sum payable by the assessee as interest on any loan or borrowing
              from any public financial institution (or a State financial corporation or
              a State industrial investment corporation), in accordance with the term
              and conditions of the agreement governing such loan or borrowing "



       As the interest in question is payable to Govt. Of India and the statement of

UP Government, section 43(B)(d) does not apply. Hence we dismiss this ground.







8.     Ground 3 is against the deletion of disallowance of additional income on the

ground that it is in the nature of penalty. In our view the first appellate authority has

rightly held that the expenditure in question i.e additional interest, is a contractual


                                                                                              3
                                                                 ITA No.6157/Del/2012
                                              ACIT vs. The Baghpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd.

obligation and hence allowable as expenses. He followed his predecessor's order on

the same issue for the assessment year 2002-03 and revenue has accepted this

order. Thus we dismiss this ground of the revenue.


          In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed.


          Order pronounced in the open court on 7th August, 2015.


                    sd/-                                         sd/-
            (G.C. GUPTA)                             (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY)
          VICE PRESIDENT                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: the    7. 8. 2015
`veena'

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR
6.    Guard File                              By order
                                                         Dy. Registrar

Sl.                    Description                        Date
No.

 1.   Date of dictation by the Author                    4.8.2015

 2.   Draft placed before the Dictating Member           5.8.2015

 3.   Draft placed before the Second Member

 4.   Draft approved by the Second Member

 5.   Date of approved order comes to the Sr. PS

 6.   Date of pronouncement of order

 7.   Date of file sent to the Bench Clerk

 8.   Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk

 9.   Date of dispatch of order




                                                                                                   4

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting