« Top Headlines » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  New Income Tax Act: ITR forms to be issued prior to FY28, says govt  GSTR-9C Explained: Turnover Limit, Due Date, Statement Format & How to Prepare It in Tally Prime (2025 Update)  Will Income Tax Department release new ITR forms by January 2026? Finance Ministry says this  The Government of India has strengthened MSME protection through strict payment rules, ensuring that Micro & Small Enterprises receive timely payments from buyers. Under the MSME Development Act (MSMED Act), 2006, buyers must make payments within:  ITR Refund Delays in India: Why They Happen & How to FastTrack Your Refund in 2025  ITR Refund Delay: From Bank Errors To Department Checks, 5 Big Reasons Your Refund Gets Stuck  Income Tax Slabs 2025: New Vs Old Regime; Which One Is Better For You For FY2025-26?  Seamless Integration: How Tally Prime Connects Businesses to the Digital Economy  Govt to notify new ITR forms, Income Tax Act 2025 rules by January 2026: CBDT chief  Digital Efficiency for MSMEs: The Tally Prime Advantage  5 Ways Tally Prime Reduces Cost and Boosts Productivity for Startups «  Govt to scrap cost audit in select sectors... Periodic monitoring of I-T Act essential, says Union Law... » SC gives relief to Hindustan Coca Cola in TDS case August, 17th 2007 The Supreme Court on Thursday held that Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt Ltd (HCCB) is not liable to pay further tax to the government on warehousing charges paid to a company, which had already deposited the due tax. While allowing the appeal of the soft drinks major, a bench comprising Justices S H Kapadia and B Sudershan Reddy observed that tax authorities cannot claim taxes twice after the second party Pradeep Oil Corporation had paid the levy. The court set aside the Delhi High Court judgement, saying it should not have interfered with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order to reopen the matter. "In the instant case, the appellant (HCCB) had paid the interest under Section 201 (1A) of Income Tax Act and there is no dispute that the tax due had been paid by deductee-assessee (Pradeep Oil Corp)... There is no dispute that POC has already paid the taxes due on its income received from HCCB and had received refund from the tax department," it held. HCCB had entered into an agreement with POC for use of premises for storage purposes and had paid warehousing charges after deducting tax at source at the rate of two per cent. However, tax authorities had held the soft drinks company as 'assessee in default', ruling that it should have deducted tax at 20 per cent as against two per cent. This was because warehousing charges were in the nature of rent as defined in explanation to Section 194-I of the Act, they had ruled. However, the Tribunal, had ruled that though HCCB was rightly held to be an 'assessee in default', but there could be no further recovery of tax considering that POC had already paid taxes on the amount received from the former. HCCL had submitted that no further tax could be collected from it as POC had paid the due taxes.