Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Tally On Cloud Tally on Cloud: Ready for the Daily Backup Requirement
Keep your Tally books accessible from anywhere while supporting your Rule 46(8) obligations. With daily backups configured on servers physically located in India, Tally on Cloud helps you maintain the backup arrangement required for electronic books of account under the Income-tax Rules, 2026. Move your Tally to the cloud with confidence.
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Mock Test Papers Series - I & II for Students appearing in CA Foundation January 2027 Examination.
 Income Tax Rules 2026: CBDT Introduces Revised Form 161 for Penalty Waiver, Clarifies Misreporting Categories and Taxpayer Relief
 ITR Filing and Income Tax Audit Deadline Extended: 5 Critical Things Taxpayers Must Know
 Filing Belated ITR for AY 2026-27? Know Which Losses You Can Carry Forward and Which You May Lose
 CBDT Extends Tax Audit Report Deadline to October 21, ITR Filing Last Date to November 21 for AY 2026-27
 CBDT Extends AY 2026-27 ITR Filing Deadline for Tax-Audit Cases: New Dates and Key Compliance Details
 Foreign Assets Missing From Your ITR? Income Tax Department Opens One-Time Disclosure Window
 Tax Audit Deadline September 30: Why AIS, TDS and GST Figures May Not Match Your ITR and What Taxpayers Should Do
 Tax audit deadline September 30: Common mistakes taxpayers should avoid
 Your ITR says ‘verified’, but the refund hasn’t arrived? 5 reasons why your money could be stuck
 Missed the ITR Deadline but TDS Refund Is Due? Here’s How You Can Still Claim Your Money

When does private turn public?
August, 31st 2006
The Delhi High Court has held that "unless a private company is a subsidiary of a public company it cannot be treated as a public company." The Companies (Amendment) Act 2000 had amended Section 3 of the 1956 Act to provide that a private corporate which is a subsidiary of public company will be public outfit. The Amendment Act had specifically removed the category of `deemed public companies' under Section 43A of the Act. A deemed public company basically refers to a private company which is deemed to have become public under certain circumstances. However, such deemed public companies were permitted by Section 43A to retain the three restrictive conditions which are mandatorily required to be present in the Articles of a private company. These conditions, inter alia, restrict the free transferability of shares, and prohibit inviting the public to subscribe to the shares of the company. The Amendment Act had also provided a summary procedure for conversion of a deemed public company into a private company. Thus, in effect, the legal position is that the law permits only two categories of companies public and private. However, notwithstanding this clear position, one basic issue still remains un-resolved: Can a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company continue to retain the three restrictive conditions in its Articles? CLB vs High Court ruling This confusion is further compounded by a recent decision of the Company Law Board (CLB) in Hillcrest Realty Sdn.Bhd vs Hotel Queenroad (P) Ltd [(2006) 72 CLA 245 CLB]. In this case, the CLB held that the basic characteristics of a private company do not get altered by the mere fact that such a company is a subsidiary of a public company. The CLB further held that such a company may be a public company for the other provisions of the Act, but the three restrictive conditions contained in its Articles will continue to be operative. This decision will only re-establish the position of a third category of companies, whereas the Amendment Act had categorically removed the same. Incidentally, the Delhi High Court, in the Hotel Queenroad (P) Ltd vs Hillcrest Realty Sdn.Bhd [(2006) 68 SCL 197] case, held that "unless a private company is a subsidiary of a public company it cannot be treated as a public company." The court, on this basis, denied voting rights of preference shareholders of a private company on the ground that it was not the subsidiary of a public company. The court's views are certainly in line with the spirit of the Amendment Act and should prevail. However, the Government must clear the iota of confusion by further amending the Act so as to replace the words "nothing in this section will apply to a private company unless it is a subsidiary of a public company" by the words "nothing in this section shall apply to a private company." Amit K. Vyas (The author is Counsel Company Affairs and Legal of L&T Ltd, Mumbai.)
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting