Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Shri Ramit Vohra, Prop. M/s. Impact Enterprises, 9210/5, Multani Dhanda, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle : 63 (1) New Delhi.
 Smt. Bhavana Jain, Prop. M/s Akash Metal Industries, outside Barsi Gate, Hansi, Haryana Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Hisar, Haryana
 M/s Pearey Lal & Sons (E.P.) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Rohtak.
 Rajvanti Devi R/o Liwan Sonipat w/o Phool Kumar 96, R Model Town, Sonipat. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sonipat.
 M/s. Anthena Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as Good Life Impex Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Income Tax Officer(E), Ward 6(2), (Old Jurisdiction)
 Ram Naresh Sikarwar, Ballabgarh. Vs. ITO, Ward-II(2), Faridabad.
 District Manager, HAFED, Site No.01, Opp.Main Market, Sector-5, Kurukshetra, Haryana Vs. JCIT, TDS Range, Karnal, Haryana
 Ravi Kumar Verma C/o. Pushkar Jain, Advocate, 115-C, Jain Nagar, Merut City-2 Uttar Pradesh Vs. ACIT Circle-2 Mewat
 Poonam Jain, A-2/15, F.F., Phase-3 Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 34(4), Room No. 713, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi
 AKT IMPEX PVT. LTD., D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), NEW DELHI
 Nitin Gupta Shree Ji Jewellers, Shop No. 1168/3 and 4, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni Chowk Vs. ITO Ward-47(4) New Delhi

Charan Pal Village Sadarpur, Ghaziabad Vs. ITO Ward 1(2), Ghaziabad
July, 09th 2021

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI
BENCH ‘SMC-1’, NEW DELHI

BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

ITA No.6874/Del/2018
(Assessment Year : 2008-09)

Charan Pal Vs. ITO
Village Sadarpur, Ward – 1(2),
Ghaziabad Ghaziabad

PAN : BGZPC 9993 E (RESPONDENT)
(APPELLANT)

Assessee by Shri Akshit Goel, CA
Revenue by --None--

Date of hearing: 08.07.2021
Date of Pronouncement: 08.07.2021

ORDER

PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order
dated 31.08.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-
Ghaziabad relating to Assessment Year 2008-09.

2. Before us, assessee has moved an application dated
07.07.2021 wherein the assessee has stated that it has opted for
Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) 2020 and has filed the declaration (Form-
1) and undertaking (Form-2) Scheme and department had issued
Form-3. The assessee, therefore, seeks to withdraw the appeal.
2

3. After considering the request made by the assessee, I
dismiss the appeal of assessee as withdrawn subject to a caveat
that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned
assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the
aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the
Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall
consider such application appropriately as per law. With these
directions, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 08.07.2021,
immediately after conclusion of the hearing of the matter in
virtual mode.

Sd/-

Date:- 08.07.2021 (ANIL CHATURVEDI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
PY*
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy forwarded to: ITAT NEW DELHI

1. Appellant

2. Respondent

3. CIT

4. CIT(Appeals)

5. DR: ITAT

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting