Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« General »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Refund (ITR) Status Check for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) A Simple Guide
 How to Use Barcode Inventory Software in TallyPrime Complete Step-by Step Guide for Businesses (2025)
 How to Use Barcode Inventory Software in TallyPrime Complete Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses (2025)
 Which Tally is Best for You in 2025? Complete Guide to TallyPrime, TallyPrime Edit Log & TallyPrime Server
 How the IT & Technology Industry Can Use Tally Prime The Complete 2025 Guide to Smarter Finance, Billing & Automation
 How to Create a Proforma Invoice in Tally: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 2025
 Tally Prime and the Rise of Cloud-Native Accounting in India
 Step-by-Step: Using Tally Prime for Financial Reports and Cash Flow
 Zero Errors, Zero Hassle: How Tally Prime Reinvents Tax Compliance
 Gold Price Today in South India Madurai, Hyderabad, Warangal & Kochi (10 Nov 2025)
 How to Record Bank Statement Entry in Tally Prime

SC notice to Reliance Ind, others on Orissa govt's plea
July, 09th 2008

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to Reliance Industries, Bharti Airtel, Hindalco, Tata Refractories and others on a plea by Orissa government, challenging a high court ruling which held levy of entry tax under the Orissa Entry Tax Act 1999 was unconstitutional.

A bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia sought reply from the companies as to why tax should not be imposed on goods imported and not manufactured or processed in Orissa.

Earlier, a batch of cross appeals were also filed by Tata Sponge Iron Ltd, Vedanta Aluminium, Bhushan Steel & Strips and others challenging imposition of entry tax on the goods entering the state.

The companies held that the Orissa High Court had erred in not declaring the Act as ultra vires after holding that the state had no jurisdiction to impose tax on imported goods.

According to the state government, while the High Court had sustained the validity of the Act it had also concluded that the state had no jurisdiction to impose tax on such goods.

Besides, the High Court had also directed the state government to make scrutiny of such goods without realising any entry tax on them, it said.

"The Act fulfils the criteria of a compensatory tax... The tax collected is not patently much more than the amount required for providing the facilities," the Orissa government stated in its appeal.

The High Court had given the verdict after Reliance and others in May 2006 challenged such levy on the ground that such legislation restricted free flow of trade and the state government was not providing any facility as was required.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting