Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Tally On Cloud Tally on Cloud: Ready for the Daily Backup Requirement
Keep your Tally books accessible from anywhere while supporting your Rule 46(8) obligations. With daily backups configured on servers physically located in India, Tally on Cloud helps you maintain the backup arrangement required for electronic books of account under the Income-tax Rules, 2026. Move your Tally to the cloud with confidence.
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Foreign Assets Missing From Your ITR? Income Tax Department Opens One-Time Disclosure Window
 Tax Audit Deadline September 30: Why AIS, TDS and GST Figures May Not Match Your ITR and What Taxpayers Should Do
 Tax audit deadline September 30: Common mistakes taxpayers should avoid
 Your ITR says ‘verified’, but the refund hasn’t arrived? 5 reasons why your money could be stuck
 Missed the ITR Deadline but TDS Refund Is Due? Here’s How You Can Still Claim Your Money
 ITAT Cuts ?4.85 Lakh Penalty After ?14.02 Lakh Interest Income Was Missed in ITR
 ITR filed under old regime, tax calculated under new regime; Delhi ITAT gives taxpayer relief
 ITAT Delhi Quashes Tax Notice on AMU PG Student’s ?18.34 Lakh Stipend, Declares It Tax-Free Under Section 10(16)
 Advance tax deadline September 15: What happens if you missed the previous instalment payment?
 How much gold jewellery can you keep at home? Nagpur ITAT explains rules on ownership, gifts, taxability
 ?5.31 lakh TDS refund allowed by ITAT Delhi: Why absence of an original ITR did not block the taxpayer

Has SC ruling clarified BPO tax status?
July, 16th 2007

The Central Board of Direct Taxes had endeavoured to provide certainty in respect of the taxation of BPO units through its circular 5/2004 dated September 28, 2004, on the basis of attribution of income to a Permanent Establishment (PE) on an arms length basis.

In the landmark decision in DCIT versus Morgan Stanley & Co Inc., the Supreme Court rendered its judgement on the taxation of captive outsourcing activities, whether they qualify as a PE and the amount of income, which may be attributed to profits from the BPO unit.

The Supreme Court undertook a functional and factual analysis of each back-office activity undertaken by Morgan Stanleys captive BPO. The Court held that these activities were in the nature of preparatory or auxiliary services, which though carried out at fixed place, do not qualify as a PE. The Supreme Court also held that, as long as the activities were in the nature of back-office operations and no contracts were concluded by the BPO independently, there was no agency PE.

Whilst pronouncing its judgement, the Supreme Court held that definition of PE, as adopted by India, is an inclusive definition which covers, among others, service PEs, agency PEs, software PEs, etc. In passing, the Supreme Court made reference to software PEs, where service providers may be required to act according to quality control specifications of their customers. However, this does not assist in determining the scope of software PEs and has in fact left room for uncertainty.

Though the Supreme Courts ruling has provided some relief to the BPO industry, on account of broad acceptance of the principle that as long as the transfer pricing analysis takes into consideration functions and risks undertaken by the BPO unit, no further profits will be attributable to taxation of such unit. However, the statement made by the Supreme Court in passing in relation to software PEs, may be used by the tax authorities as a garb to examine the potential tax incidence of such BPOs.

Aseem Chawla
Partner (Tax),
(Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting