|
|
|
| « From the Courts » |
|---|
| Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs |  CVO Chartered & Cost Accountants Association vs. UOI (Bombay High Court) | | CIT vs. Shriram Ownership Trust (Madras High Court) | | ABHISHEK VERMA, C/O MR. JITENDRA GARG, ADVOCATE, CHAMBER NO. 137, PATIALA HOUSE COURT, NEW DELHI Vs. DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-12, ARA CENTRE, JHANDEWALAN EXTN., NEW DELHI | | Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd. NTPC Bhawan, Core-7, Scope Complex, 7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Vs. DCIT Circle-21(1) New Delhi | | The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Saharanpur. Vs. Shri Ishtiyaque Ahmed through Legal Heirs Smt. Mushyada Begum, S/Shri Mohd. Azhar, Athar and Moyeen, 1/142, Mohalla Qureshian, Saharanpur | | ACIT, Central Circle 07, New Delhi. vs. M/s. R. J. Corp Ltd., F 2/7, Okhla Indl. Area, Phase I, New Delhi. | | Experion Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. F-9, First Floor, Manish Plaza 1, Plot No. 7, M. L. U, Sector-10, Dwarka Delhi Vs. ACIT Circle-8(2) New Delhi | | USK Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. E-172, DDA, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi Vs. ITO Ward-27(1) New Delhi | | Sh. Chakra Dhari Sureka, M-14B, South Extn. Part-II, New Delhi Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, New Delhi | | ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, 299, DEEPALI ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 40(3), NEW DELHI | | B.M. Malhotra & Sons Ltd., C/o Kapil Goel, Advocate, F-26/124, Sector 7, Rohini, Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(1), New Delhi. |
|
|
|
|
|
| « Kamla Devi S. Doshi vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)... | Balgopal Trust vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)... » |
CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court) |
|
|
| June, 03rd 2017 |
Supreme Court issues strictures against the income-tax department stating that it is "extremely unhappy" with the delay of 3381 days in refiling the SLP and demands that "The concerned authorities need to wake up"
Learned Solicitor General says that in view of the decision of this Court in ACG Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-IV), Mumbai [(2012) 3 SCC 321], this petition be dismissed on merits.
We are extremely unhappy with the delay of 3381 days in refiling the special leave petition but make no other comment. The concerned authorities need to wake up.
The special leave petition is dismissed both on the ground of delay as also on merits.
|
|
|
