Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
  Amount of remuneration prescribed under section 9A(3)(m) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 5 types of tax benefits available to individuals under the Income-tax Act
 Best tax-saving options: Comparison, ranking of top 10 instruments
 Faceless Penalty Scheme, 2021
 Amount of remuneration prescribed under section 9A(3)(m) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Filed ITR? Know how to check income tax refund status
 CBDT notifies directions for giving effect to Faceless Penalty Scheme 2021
 10 Things To Consider Before Investing In Tax Saving FDs
 Notification No.03/2021 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
 Gujarat High Court directs CBDT to take appropriate decision on extension of Due date for Tax Audit Reports & Income Tax Returns
 Don t make these mistakes while filing income tax return

Supreme Court admits excise plea
June, 22nd 2009

The Supreme Court has admitted a couple of petitions filed by the excise department alleging that textile major Raymond Ltd had evaded excise duty of more than Rs 3.62 crore.    

The alleged excise evasion by Raymond relates to the period between June 1997 and June 1998, and July 1998 and December 1999.    

A bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia has admitted the appeals filed by the revenue challenging the sectoral tribunal's ruling that waived interest and penalty imposed by the department.    

The excise department, while holding Raymond guilty of misrepresentation, had issued showcause notice as to why the company should not pay duty of more than Rs 3.62 crore.    

The petition said that the deduction of 5.84 per cent sought for on account of post-removal expenses in the price list (commission to agents, bank charges and freight and insurance charges) had no relation with the discount claimed from the assessable value.    

According to the excise department, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in allowing the company's application for rectifying the mistake without considering the evidence on record.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting