Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITR Filing 2026: CBDT Upgrades Income Tax Portal Ahead of July 31 Deadline Key Changes Every Taxpayer Should Know
 Sold house for ₹1.10 crore, tax computed on ₹1.96 crore? ITAT explains when Section 54 relief is still available
 ITR 2026: How Taxpayers Earning 25 Lakh to 1 Crore Can Save Up to 1.5 Lakh Under the New Tax Regime
 Old vs New Tax Regime 2026: Which Saves More Tax If You Earn 13 Lakh?
  Presumptive Taxation in 2026 Rebate Losses & Deductions Practical Impact of the Income Tax Act 2025
 Income Tax Penalties Explained (2026): What Happens If You Under-Report Income or Miss Your ITR Filing

Supreme Court admits excise plea
June, 22nd 2009

The Supreme Court has admitted a couple of petitions filed by the excise department alleging that textile major Raymond Ltd had evaded excise duty of more than Rs 3.62 crore.    

The alleged excise evasion by Raymond relates to the period between June 1997 and June 1998, and July 1998 and December 1999.    

A bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia has admitted the appeals filed by the revenue challenging the sectoral tribunal's ruling that waived interest and penalty imposed by the department.    

The excise department, while holding Raymond guilty of misrepresentation, had issued showcause notice as to why the company should not pay duty of more than Rs 3.62 crore.    

The petition said that the deduction of 5.84 per cent sought for on account of post-removal expenses in the price list (commission to agents, bank charges and freight and insurance charges) had no relation with the discount claimed from the assessable value.    

According to the excise department, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in allowing the company's application for rectifying the mistake without considering the evidence on record.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting