Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Contractor takes IR35 fight to High Court
June, 06th 2008

An IT contractor who was last January ordered by special commissioner Charles Hellier to pay 99,000 in employment taxes under IR35 because he was part of the team of his client, is appealing the ruling in High Court.

The appeal by John Bessell, director of Dragonfly Consulting, is based on the argument that, as a freelance system tester for roadservice group AA from 2000 to 2003, he was not tantamount to an employee, Contractor.UK reports.

The appeal will be funded by the Professional Contractors Group, which says that, according to existing case law, one would expect Bessell to be found outside of IR35, contrary to Helliers ruling in January.

The group believes evidence shows Bessell was clearly in business on his own account and Dragonfly provided all Bessells equipment and necessary training for the position. He was also working for another client and went without holiday or sickness pay.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting