Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 You could lose section 80C tax benefit on EPF contribution; here's why
 Income Tax Return Filing: Why you should wait until June 15 to file ITR for FY 2023-24
 Section 43B of Income Tax Act: Expenses businesses can cover apart from payment to MSMEs
 Direct tax collections reflect disparities
 Dealing with income tax notices, intimations or letters? This new feature in ITR portal will make your life easier
 Income Tax Slabs FY 2023-24 & AY 2024-25 (New & Old Regime Tax Rates)
 How can Form 15G & Form 15H save TDS on interest income?
 How are e-filing and e-payment of taxes different? Know details here
 Income Tax return (ITR) filing 2024: What is Form 16, when is issue date and why is it crucial? Explained
 Step-by-Step Guide To File Income Tax Return FY 2023-24
 Income-tax filing: Should you file your returns in April or wait until July 31?

SC: Failure to file I-T returns not suppression of income
June, 11th 2007

Omission or negligence on the part of an assessee to disclose proper particulars of his income-tax returns would not necessarily constitute a deliberate act of suppression to invite punitive action from tax officials, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate particulars carry different connotations. Concealment refers to deliberate act on the part of the assessee. A mere omission or negligence would not constitute a deliberate act of suppression or false declaration, the apex court said.

The order imposing penalty is quasicriminal in nature and thus, the burden lies on the department to establish that the assessee had concealed his income, a Bench of Justices S B Sinha and Markandeya Katju said while upholding an appeal filed by an assessee. Appellant T Ashok Pai, an engineer had challenged a judgment of the Karnataka high court, which rejected his plea that the alleged false assessment was prepared by the Syndicate Bank, his banker to whom he had given the general power of attorney.

The high court had upheld the argument of tax officials that if the explanation of Pai was to be accepted, every tax evader could take shelter by shifting the blame on his/her clerk or accountants.

However, the SC held that if an explanation given by the assessee with regard to the mistake committed by him has been treated to be bona fide and it has been found that he had acted on the basis of wrong legal advice, the question of imposing a penalty does not arise.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting