« Top Headlines » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  Budget 2024 makes new income tax regime more attractive: See how much taxes you can now save  ITR filing 2024: New vs old income tax regimes, 6 key things to consider while filing your tax return  These five technical glitches may impact your Income tax return (ITR) filing. Know here  ITR filing 2023-24: How to optimise Section 80D deductions at the time of filing tax returns  ITR filing 2023-24: Top 7 mistakes to avoid for hassle-free income-tax return filing this year  Income tax returns for FY 2023-24: Keep these 8 tax law changes in mind while filing ITR this year  ITR Filing 2024: Know who can and cannot file income tax returns using ITR-1 this year  Income Tax Filing: 10 necessary guidelines that you must be aware of  Why you should file your income tax returns before July 31  What is Form 26AS? How to download Form 26AS to file Income Tax Return (ITR)  Income Tax Return: What are the alternatives to Form 16 that can be used while filing ITR? «  Sebi scraps UIN, makes PAN sole ID for all transactions... Cos tweak salaries to reduce FBT load... » SC extends stay on levy of enhanced entry tax by MP June, 27th 2007 The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Madhya Pradesh High Court to dispose by July 3 a matter pertaining to enhanced entry tax collected by Madhya Pradesh, while extending the stay on such a levy till July 25. A vacation bench headed by Tarun Chatterjee extended the stay -- which comes as a relief to telecom major Bharti Airtel and tobacco firm Godfrey Philips India that had challenged the levy. The matter is listed for final hearing before the High Court on July 3. The High Court had upheld the validity of the 'Madhya Pradesh sthaniya kshetra me mal ke pravesh par kar adhiniyam 1976 and 2006 (entry tax acts) and the Sanshodhan Adhiniyam 2004 on the ground that the levy being compensatory in nature was immune from the challenge. The High Court had directed the petitioners to continue depositing the entry tax on cigarettes and other similar products of tobacco and telecom related goods at the enhanced rate of 10 percent charged pursuant to the adhyadesh of 2006. Both the companies have challenged the High Court order decision upholding the state government's right to levy tax on raw materials and packaging goods in manufacture of finished goods at higher rates than the rates prescribed under the entry tax act. Senior counsel U U Lalit appeared for Madhya Pradesh, while A K Ganguli for Godfrey Philips India. The companies stated that more than 40 petitions were pending before the High Court challenging the levy of entry tax on the goods brought into the state from outside as well as the goods entering from one local area to another.