TallyPrime Auditor License (Renewal) (Multi User)   TallyPrime

  TallyPrime Silver Renewal (Single User)   TallyPrime Silver New Licence (Single User)   TallyPrime Gold New Licence (Multi User)   Purchase
Tally on
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
GST - Goods and Services Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Highest tax slab on online gaming may stunt growth
  Infosys directed to fix glitches on income tax e-filing portal
 Infosys directed to fix glitches on income tax e-filing portal
 GST Filing Deadline Extended After Portal Glitch; Know New Date to File Form GSTR-3B
 GST ITC Fraud: Delhi HC holds Debiting through Electronic ITC Ledger is valid Deposit to Fulfill Bail Condition
  95 LPA Opening General Manager Finance. Pref. from Ecommerce
 Finance Ministers faces queries from students on GST, Income Tax relief to defence personnel
 Coming soon, a structural revamp of GST
  The Top Five GST Changes Budget 2022
 CAIT urges Centre to exempt GST registration for e-commerce sales
 AAAR ruling on salary to impact head office-branch GST dynamics
 How real is the GST boost?
 GST on helmets equivalent to compromising road safety. Here's why?
 ICAI writes to CBDT seeking waiver of penalty on late filing of income tax audit reports
 Attention GST taxpayers! File GSTR-7 return for Dec before 10 Jan. Details here

GST ITC Fraud: Delhi HC holds Debiting through Electronic ITC Ledger is valid Deposit to Fulfill Bail Condition
May, 12th 2022

The single bench of Delhi High Court presided by Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta in the issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) fraud has held that debiting through electronic ITC ledger is a valid deposit to fulfill bail condition.

The petitioner, Amit Gupta, is one of the Directors or key persons in M/s Brilliant Metals Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Progressive Alloys India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s JBN Impex Pvt. Ltd. and allegedly the mastermind behind devising a mechanism of availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the strength of bills of various suppliers which were non-existing and fictitious and thus availed fraudulent ITC worth ₹27.05 crores. The petitioner was arrested and granted regular bail subject to conditions out which one was for deposit of amount of ₹2.70 crores.

The petitioner, deposited ₹1.10 crores through cash ledger and ₹1.60 crores by way of debiting/reversals through electronic ITC ledger. The Trial Court cancelled the bail granted to the petitioner believing that the ITC availed were through fraudulent means and thus the entire ITC claimed by the companies were under cloud, therefore, the petitioner not entitle to furnished ₹1.60 crores by reversal of the ITC as a condition of bail. Aggrieved petitioner filed Writ petition before the High Court.

The counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajesh Jain submitted that the petitioner has to his credit ITC worth ₹260 crores and the investigation does not show beyond ₹42 crores, ITCs are fraudulent till now. Therefore the reversal of the ITC credit for depositing the part amount of ₹2.70 crores with the department cannot be illegal or unwarranted. The counsel for the respondent, Mr. Harpreet Singh submitted that ITCs being fraudulent the same cannot be availed for deposit.

The High Court has held that “the petitioner having fulfilled the condition of deposit of the amount partly by cash ledger and partly by debit ledger of the ITC it cannot be said that the petitioner has failed to fulfil the conditions imposed on him. Consequently, the impugned order passed by the learned CMM, Patiala House Court is set aside”.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2022 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting