Tally for Practicing CAs Gold Edition (Multi User) Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
From the Courts »
 Varun Gupta, C52, Shakti Nagar Extension, Delhi Vs ITO, Ward47(4), Room No. 406, 4th Floor, BlockD, Pratyakash Kar Bhawan, Civic Centre, JL Nehru Marg, New Delhi
 ACIT, Central Circle-26, New Delhi Vs. Anurag Dalmia, 2 nd Floor, Indraprakash Building, 21 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi
 ACIT, Central Circle 16 New Delhi Vs. Smt. Vinita Chaurasia, 575, Double Storey Flats New Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi 110 060.
 M/s. Gangeshwari Metals Pvt. Ltd Shop No.4, 169, Shivkhand Vishwakarma Nagar, Jhilmil Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 11 (3), New Delhi
 ITAT: Indirect transfer of Indian assets will not attract LTCG tax
 M/s. Akhil Meditech Pvt. Ltd., C-30, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi. Vs The ACIT, Central Circle 6, New Delhi.
 Dissenting states likely to accept GST solution
 Shri Aftab Ahmed Zaki Ahmed, 5807, Main Sadar Bazar, 5807, Main Sadar Bazar, Delhi Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Range-63, New Delhi. New Delhi.
 Shri Aman Mehtani, H.No.73, National H.No.73, National Cooperative Society, Cooperative Society, Baner Road, Baner Road, Pune. Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Faridabad.
 Ms. Renu Sharma, WZ-163, 2nd Floor, Hastsal Road, A- Hastsal Road, A-Block, Uttam Nagar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-44(2), New Delhi.
 MUFG Bank Ltd, 5 th Floor, Worldmark 2, Asset 8, Aerocity, NH 8, New Delhi Vs. ACIT (International Taxation), Circle 2(2)(1), New Delhi

CIT vs. Rekha Bai (Supreme Court)
April, 14th 2017

S. 132: It is but natural that concealed income found at the time of search and survey has to be distributed among all the family members who were carrying on business. It is also a reasonable conclusion that the income had been earned over a period of time and should be spread over various years

(i) Less than 50% of the face value of the promotes should only be treated as the amounts advanced and consequently the undisclosed income of the assessee;

(ii) The concealed income has to be treated as belonging to various members of the assessee’s family and dividing the same between them instead of taxing the entire amount in the assessee’s hands;

(iii) The undisclosed income has to be spread over a period of five years.

On appeal by the department to the Supreme Court HELD dismissing the appeal:

The Department has failed to bring on record any material to the contrary except the seized documents which, in our considered opinion, could not absolve the Department or give any right to negate the view taken by the first Appellate Authority and the Tribunal. So far as the income divided among the family members of the assessee is concerned, we find that all of them were carrying on same business from the same premises. Therefore, it is but natural that if any concealed income has been found at the time of search and survey, it has to be distributed among all the family members who were carrying on business.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting