Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« General »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Won case against income tax department but still waiting for benefit? No more delay after an update in ITR portal
 Income Tax Department regrets issuing erroneous notices to taxpayers: Know the details
 Income Tax Return: Miss THIS ITR filing deadline and you will be fined Rs 10000
 Tax contribution of petroleum sector set to drop rapidly in FY 2024-25
 Missed reporting foreign assets in ITR? File revised return to avoid Rs 10 lakh penalty
 Tax regime shift: Is filing ITR under old regime still valid after default new regime?
 Income Tax Department Targets Bogus Refund Claims, Issues Notices To Taxpayers
 IT firms bullish on higher spending due to tax cuts
 How to calculate capital gains tax on sale of land?
 Don't fall for fake notices! How to verify your income tax communication
 I decided to shift to the new tax regime. Will I lose benefit on interest income of my PPF account?

TN seeks compensation till GST is introduced
April, 16th 2012

Tamil Nadu has asked the Government of India to provide compensation till Goods and Service Tax (GST) was introduced as the revenue loss suffered by states was substantial and permanent.

It also said non-implementation of GST from April 1, 2010, should not be taken as a ground to stop the Central Sales Tax (CST) compensation.

In a letter to the Prime Minister, chief minister J Jayalalithaa said the chairman, empowered committee of state finance ministers, had already conveyed the objections of state governments, including Tamil Nadu. But it is unfortunate that the Government of India is still sticking to its unreasonable stance.
Though the Government of India had agreed to compensate states for the revenue loss for 2010-2011 also, the eligible compensation for 2010-2011 was arbitrarily restricted by deducting the additional revenue realised through the revision of value-added tax (VAT) rate from four per cent to five per cent.

I would like to point out that the action of the Government of India in linking CST compensation with the additional revenue on account of VAT rate revision is unilateral, arbitrary and untenable. There is no link between CST rate reduction and VAT rate enhancement. It was never a part of the guidelines for CST compensation, she stated.

The decision to stop CST compensation from 2011-2012 is equally objectionable, she said further.

The CST rate was reduced only as a precursor to the introduction of GST. Since, it is the Government of Indias responsibility to introduce GST by evolving a consensus and by putting in place appropriate mechanisms, states cannot be expected to bear the loss on account of its failure to introduce GST, it said.

Moreover, they are suffering huge revenue loss on account of the CST rate reduction. In fact, our state could have realised an additional revenue of Rs 2,000 crore between 2007-08 and 2010-11, even after taking into account the Government of Indias compensation.

This tax loss pushed back the revenue base to a lower level and the state continues to suffer incremental revenue loss, which will be in the range of Rs1,500 crore to Rs 2,000 crore per annum in the next three years.

If further delay is expected in implementing GST, then the CST rate must be restored immediately to the original four per cent, she said.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting