Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
General »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 How to calculate income tax on stock market gains along with your salary?
 Moonlighting for Additional Income? Know Its Tax Implications
 Have you claimed education cess? Be prepared to pay tax as per the new rules
 Reserve Bank - Integrated Ombudsman Scheme, 2021 (RBIOS, 2021)
 How is tax computed for selling a house?
 How much tax do you pay on equity investments?
 Fuel taxes: Centre s gains striking since FY16
 Tax rules for NRIs on sale of assets located in India
 ITR filing: Know tax rules that apply to freelancers in India
 Delhi Real Estate News: NDMC extends last date for property tax payment with amnesty scheme
 Citizens must file THESE ITR related forms before due date Income Tax Returns

SC drops Pepsico petition against sales tax demand
April, 07th 2011

The Supreme Court has dismissed the petition of beverages major Pepsico that challenged the imposition of sales tax on rentals collected from its distributors for glass bottles and crates.

A bench comprising justices Munkundakam Sharma and A R Dave dismissed the petition of Pepsico India , a unit of the US-based foods and beverages major, challenging the direction of the taxing official to pay sales tax on the rentals.

The sales tax department of Uttar Pradesh had directed the company to pay the duty on Rs 8.5 crore collected from its distributors in 1999-2000.

The officials also directed Pepsico to pay interest on the sum acquired from rentals of glass bottles and crates.

Pepsico contended that it did not constitute a sale under the UP Trade Tax Act. Rental on glass bottles and crates did not amount to transfer of right to use the goods for value.

However, the Supreme Court rejected the contentions of Pepsico by observing that the company in its accounts itself mentioned the revenue generated from it.

"In the present case, the appellant (Pepsico) has themselves mentioned in their account the turnover in respect of rentals by distributors of glass and crates. However, Pepsico has disputed that the said turnover is liable to tax," the bench said.

Earlier, Pepsico had approached the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court seeking revision of the tax demand, which dismissed its petition in December 2007.

Following it, Pepsico approached the Supreme Court, which has also dismissed its petition.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting