Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« General »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Filing ITR Under Section 44AD? Key Disclosures You Still Need to Make
 ?1 Crore-Earning IITian with 3 Houses Borrowed ?15,000 for Income Tax Return, Claims Chartered Accountant
 How Can an Income Tax Calculator Help with Better Financial Planning?
 RBI issues Amendment Directions on Capital Market Exposure
 RBI Issues Draft Amendment Directions for instructions on Lending to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs)
 Income Tax Refund (ITR) Status Check for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) A Simple Guide
 How to Use Barcode Inventory Software in TallyPrime Complete Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses (2025)
 Which Tally is Best for You in 2025? Complete Guide to TallyPrime, TallyPrime Edit Log & TallyPrime Server
 How the IT & Technology Industry Can Use Tally Prime The Complete 2025 Guide to Smarter Finance, Billing & Automation
 How to Create a Proforma Invoice in Tally: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 2025
 Tally Prime and the Rise of Cloud-Native Accounting in India

SC drops Pepsico petition against sales tax demand
April, 07th 2011

The Supreme Court has dismissed the petition of beverages major Pepsico that challenged the imposition of sales tax on rentals collected from its distributors for glass bottles and crates.

A bench comprising justices Munkundakam Sharma and A R Dave dismissed the petition of Pepsico India , a unit of the US-based foods and beverages major, challenging the direction of the taxing official to pay sales tax on the rentals.

The sales tax department of Uttar Pradesh had directed the company to pay the duty on Rs 8.5 crore collected from its distributors in 1999-2000.

The officials also directed Pepsico to pay interest on the sum acquired from rentals of glass bottles and crates.

Pepsico contended that it did not constitute a sale under the UP Trade Tax Act. Rental on glass bottles and crates did not amount to transfer of right to use the goods for value.

However, the Supreme Court rejected the contentions of Pepsico by observing that the company in its accounts itself mentioned the revenue generated from it.

"In the present case, the appellant (Pepsico) has themselves mentioned in their account the turnover in respect of rentals by distributors of glass and crates. However, Pepsico has disputed that the said turnover is liable to tax," the bench said.

Earlier, Pepsico had approached the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court seeking revision of the tax demand, which dismissed its petition in December 2007.

Following it, Pepsico approached the Supreme Court, which has also dismissed its petition.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting