Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

ITAT to decide on plea
April, 13th 2010

The Supreme Court has asked the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to decide the validity of a department notice seeking to initiate reassessment proceedings against Swaraj Engines Ltd. The issue has been remanded to the tribunal in view of the revenue departments appeal pending before it.

The tax authorities had initially allowed deductions to Swaraj Engines, a joint venture between Kirloskar Group and the Punjab government, for the assessment year 1990-91 and six successive years from 1991-92 to 1996-97, under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act 1961.

While the deduction under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act was confirmed for 1997-98, the department had issued notice to the firm in 2002 purporting to withdraw deductions on the grounds that the assessee, in its annual report for FY 1988-89 had indicated sales of 346 engines manufactured before March 31, 1989.

Taking into account the particulars of sales, the revenue department stated that the manufacturing or production of engines had allegedly started during 1989-90, and thus the firm was not entitled to the benefit during 1997-98. Even the Punjab and Haryana High Courts had dismissed Swaraj Engines plea against initiation of the reassessment proceedings.

However, while the appeal was pending in the apex court, the commissioner of income tax (appeals) (CIT) had allowed deduction for 1997-98, saying that assembling of the engine did not amount to manufacturing for the purposes of claiming deduction.

However, the departments appeal against the CITs order is pending before the tribunal. While additional solicitor general, Vivek Tankha, argued the case for the department, senior counsel ML Verma represented the assessee.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting