Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 New Income Tax Act: ITR forms to be issued prior to FY28, says govt
 GSTR-9C Explained: Turnover Limit, Due Date, Statement Format & How to Prepare It in Tally Prime (2025 Update)
 Will Income Tax Department release new ITR forms by January 2026? Finance Ministry says this
 The Government of India has strengthened MSME protection through strict payment rules, ensuring that Micro & Small Enterprises receive timely payments from buyers. Under the MSME Development Act (MSMED Act), 2006, buyers must make payments within:
 ITR Refund Delays in India: Why They Happen & How to FastTrack Your Refund in 2025
 ITR Refund Delay: From Bank Errors To Department Checks, 5 Big Reasons Your Refund Gets Stuck
 Income Tax Slabs 2025: New Vs Old Regime; Which One Is Better For You For FY2025-26?
 Seamless Integration: How Tally Prime Connects Businesses to the Digital Economy
 Govt to notify new ITR forms, Income Tax Act 2025 rules by January 2026: CBDT chief
 Digital Efficiency for MSMEs: The Tally Prime Advantage
 5 Ways Tally Prime Reduces Cost and Boosts Productivity for Startups

Sugar SAP part of purchase price, to be taxable: SC
April, 09th 2008

In a setback to sugar mill owners, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the state advised price paid by them formed a part of the purchase price paid to the sugarcane growers and was, therefore, to be included in their turnover for the purpose of computation of tax.

A bench comprising Justice Arijit Pasayat, Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Aftab Alam allowed an appeal by Karnataka. It had challenged an order of the Karnataka High Court, which had held that in the absence of agreement between sugarcane buyers and sugarcane growers, the payment of excess amount fixed by the state/central government was not to be reckoned for the purpose of purchase tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

The state government, however, had said that purchase tax was payable on the purchase price. The consideration paid for making purchase is the purchase price. On the other hand, the mill owner, in this case, Sri Chamundeswari Sugar, had said that because it was agreed by the grower and the purchaser that a certain amount would be paid, the amount paid as SAP becomes irrelevant.

Rejecting the plea, the court said, In fact, an agreement cannot determine the question of liability to pay the purchase tax.

In our view appellants (state of Karnataka and Others) were justified in demanding purchase tax on the amount paid as SAP and the high courts view is clearly unsustainable and is set aside said Justice Pasayat writing the verdict.

In this case, the assessing authority for the assessment years 1990-1991, 1991-1992, 1992-93 and 1993-94 had passed assessment orders taking into consideration the statutory minimum price fixed by the central government, SAP fixed by the state of Karnataka and all other amounts paid to sugarcane growers by the company as the purchase price paid to sugarcane growers and had levied purchase tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

It was challenged by the company in the high court. The grievance of the company was that the assessing authority was not justified in levying purchase tax on the amount paid by the factory to the sugarcane growers over and above the statutory minimum price fixed by the central government.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting