Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 No Evidence of Tax Evasion by showing Fictitious or False Transactions: ITAT deletes Addition of Expenditure u/s 40A(3)
 Earning Interest Income from Inter-Corporate Deposit is Business Income: ITAT
 Income Tax Penalty u/s 271E cannot be levied in the absence of Regular Assessment: ITAT
 ITAT deletes Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Firm not Taxable for Capital introduced by Partner
 Payment for Facebook Ads and Other Digital Advertising Companies not subject to TDS as per DTAA: ITAT
 No Service Tax Leviable on Goods component of Composite Works Contract as VAT has been paid: CESTAT
 ITAT deletes Addition on Account of Investment made from Undisclosed Sources as all Transactions were made through Banking Channels
 Relief to Honda: ITAT directs AO to delete Addition on account of Capitalisation of Royalty Expenses by Holding it to be Revenue in Nature
 Minimising tax liabilities by lawful means not illegal, says ITAT
 Interest paid on Late Payment of Service Tax is a Deductible Business Expenditure: ITAT
 ITAT upholds Addition on Account of Unaccounted Cash as no mention of Agricultural Land on Translated Document

Notice issued u/s 143(2) to be served upon the assessee within six months: ITAT
March, 18th 2021

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench ruled that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income tax Act to be served upon the assessee within six months.

The assessee, Sajan Kumar Jain challenged the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer by raising the additional ground of appeal that CIT-A erred in sustaining the order passed by AO under section 143(3) without appreciating that as stated in the opening portion of the impugned assessment order regular return under section 139(1) of the Act was submitted on March 20, 2017, and notice under section 143(2) is admittedly issued as noted at second page of the assessment order, which is manifestly time barred as last date for issuance of notice under section 143(2) as reckoned for period under consideration (which is search year) from March 31, 2017 would be September 30, 2017 and so notice under section 143(2) issued on October 16, 2017 is time-barred and accordingly assessment framed under section 143(3) and order of CIT-A may be quashed.

 

The original return of income under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was filed on March 20, 2017 declaring income of Rs. 6.22 crores. The said return of income was processed under section 143(1) of the Act on May 20, 2017. Subsequently, pursuant to search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Act, which was carried out on November 18, 2015, the case of the appellant was centralised from Circle -1 Faridabad to Central Circle 25, New Delhi.

The coram of Bhavnesh Saini and N.K.Billaiya quash the assessment order framed under section 143(3) of the Act for want of jurisdiction as notice issued under section 143(2) of the Act is barred by limitation.


Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2022 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting