Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 GSTR-3B deadline expired: File now to avoid input tax credit loss, GST registration cancellation
 ITR Filing: Income tax department shortens time limit for condonation of delay What it means for taxpayers
 CBDT launches campaign to intimate taxpayers on undeclared foreign assets in ITR
 ITR AY2024-25: CBDT launches campaign for taxpayers to report income from foreign sources
  CBDT comes out with FAQs on Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas scheme 2024
 CBDT weighs overhaul of designations for income tax officials to secure better clarity
 Direct tax-GDP ratio at millennial high in FY24
 CBDT comes out with FAQs on Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas scheme 2024
 Tax filing: How to choose the right ITR form
 Income Tax Return: How to maximise your tax refunds while filing ITR?
 Last date for filing income tax return (ITR)

Sec 17 showroom fined 17,000 for charging extra VAT
March, 04th 2016

Taking serious note of the practice of traders charging value added tax (VAT) on price which is inclusive of all taxes because of discount offers, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum asked an Adidas showroom in Sector 17 to refund Rs 449.93 and pay Rs 17,000 to a consumer.

Anu Pratap, a resident of Sector 16, Chandigarh in her complaint before Consumer Forum said she bought a pair of shoes from the showroom under a promotional offer of 40% off.

"Maximum retail price of the said shoes was Rs 5,999 which was inclusive of all taxes," the complaint read. She alleged that after giving 40% discount, the opposite parties charged Rs 4,049 from her and charged Rs 449.93 as VAT on Rs 5,999, which was already inclusive of all taxes.

Pratap served a legal notice on showroom authorities seeking refund of the excess amount charged. But instead of refunding the amount, they sent a "vague and evasive reply" justifying their action of charging VAT.

The complainant described the aforesaid act and conduct as deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. Despite a notice, no one appeared on behalf of the showroom and the case was proceeded ex-parte.

"This act of the showroom managers draws an adverse inference against them," the forum stated. Their non-appearance shows they have nothing to say in their defence against the allegations made by the complainant. Therefore, assertions of the complainant go unrebutted and uncontroverted, the forum held.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting