Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« General »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Won case against income tax department but still waiting for benefit? No more delay after an update in ITR portal
 Income Tax Department regrets issuing erroneous notices to taxpayers: Know the details
 Income Tax Return: Miss THIS ITR filing deadline and you will be fined Rs 10000
 Tax contribution of petroleum sector set to drop rapidly in FY 2024-25
 Missed reporting foreign assets in ITR? File revised return to avoid Rs 10 lakh penalty
 Tax regime shift: Is filing ITR under old regime still valid after default new regime?
 Income Tax Department Targets Bogus Refund Claims, Issues Notices To Taxpayers
 IT firms bullish on higher spending due to tax cuts
 How to calculate capital gains tax on sale of land?
 Don't fall for fake notices! How to verify your income tax communication
 I decided to shift to the new tax regime. Will I lose benefit on interest income of my PPF account?

Tax case: SC asks Nokia to sumbit valuation of Indian asset
March, 14th 2014

The Supreme Court today said that it wants to find some sort of an amicable solution that is acceptable to both Nokia and the Income Tax (I-T) department and that it wants to protect the interests of both the parties.

For this, Nokia has been asked to submit a report of valuation of its India entities because the Supreme Court wants to make sure that even after the Microsoft deal goes through, there is sufficient amount that can secure the interests of the I-T department. Once Nokia comes back with the valuations, an upfront amount they said approximately would be in the range of Rs 2700-3000 crore for its India operations, a view is going to be taken up by the Supreme Court.

The I-T department reiterated that there is at least tax liability of Rs 10000 crore against Nokia and that the company must be asked to submit a bank guarantee and not just an undertaking.

It also wanted Nokia Finland to submit an assurance. To which the Supreme Court said that Nokia Finland, which is a holding company cannot be forced to protect the interest of the subsidiary.

The apex court also pointed out that Rs 3500 crore, which was paid by Nokia India to Nokia Finland by way of dividends cannot be brought back simply because it is the right of the subsidiary to pay dividend to the holding company.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting