« From the Courts » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses  Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate  Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court  Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings  Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT  Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.  ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand  Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities  [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court  Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger  Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court «  Punjab Govt appeal dismissed... Penalty:Concealment of income - Bona fide belief... » SC: Arbitration agreements must be adhered to by the parties March, 21st 2008 The Supreme Court ruled last week that if the parties to a contract agree on the arbitrator, the place of arbitration and the court for deciding disputed questions, these should be adhered to.   Dismissing the arbitration petition of Shivnath Rai Harnarain (India) Ltd for appointment of a mediator in terms of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the arbitration judge noted that the parties chose Samuel Marshal as the arbitrator and the venue as Singapore. His award in favour of the firm was set aside by a Singapore court.   The firm then moved the Supreme Court for appointment of an arbitrator. The court rejected this as the arbitration on agreed terms was held in Singapore and the court there passed the order. Therefore, it cannot turn around now and ask the Indian court to appoint an arbitrator.