« Top Headlines » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  Delhi HC Rules GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without a Clear Show Cause Notice (SCN)  Belated income tax return AY 2026-27: How to file, late filing charges and what you may lose  Major Financial Changes from August 1, 2026: ITR Deadline, RBI MPC Meeting, Tatkal Ticket Rules & More  Government proposes to ease tax relief conditions for offshore funds  TallyPrime Connected Banking: Automating Banking and Accounting  ITR Filing Deadline 2026: Is July 31 the Last Date to File Your Income Tax Return? Latest Official Update  ITR filing deadline nears: How to file income tax return online on e-filing portal - quick 15-step guide  Will the ITR Filing Deadline Be Extended Beyond July 31 for FY 2025-26? Here's the Latest Update for Taxpayers  Income Tax Refund Delayed for AY 2026-27? 5 Common Reasons Your Refund May Be Stuck and How to Fix It  ITR Filing 2026: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Asks Tax Officials to Let Honest Taxpayers Correct Genuine Mistakes  Will Your FCNR Deposit Stay Tax-Free After Returning to India? Tax Rules Explained for NRIs «  Taxman's return gift is Rs 40,000 cr... SC decides determinant for excise duty exemption... » CIT appeal dismissed March, 25th 2008 The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal of the Commissioner of Income Tax against the judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of chit fund companies (Commissioner vs Bilahari Investment Ltd).   The companies were following the completed contract method of accounting and the authorities had so far accepted this method. But now, they have turned around and insisted that they should have adopted the percentage of completion method of accounting.   Rejecting this argument, the Supreme Court said: Every assessee is entitled to arrange its affairs and follow the method of accounting which the department had earlier accepted. It is only in those cases where the department records a finding that the method adopted by the assessee results in distortion of profits that the department can insist on substitution of the existing method.   This was not the case here, and the change would be revenue neutral even if the new method is adopted.