Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 New Income Tax Act: ITR forms to be issued prior to FY28, says govt
 GSTR-9C Explained: Turnover Limit, Due Date, Statement Format & How to Prepare It in Tally Prime (2025 Update)
 Will Income Tax Department release new ITR forms by January 2026? Finance Ministry says this
 The Government of India has strengthened MSME protection through strict payment rules, ensuring that Micro & Small Enterprises receive timely payments from buyers. Under the MSME Development Act (MSMED Act), 2006, buyers must make payments within:
 ITR Refund Delays in India: Why They Happen & How to FastTrack Your Refund in 2025
 ITR Refund Delay: From Bank Errors To Department Checks, 5 Big Reasons Your Refund Gets Stuck
 Income Tax Slabs 2025: New Vs Old Regime; Which One Is Better For You For FY2025-26?
 Seamless Integration: How Tally Prime Connects Businesses to the Digital Economy
 Govt to notify new ITR forms, Income Tax Act 2025 rules by January 2026: CBDT chief
 Digital Efficiency for MSMEs: The Tally Prime Advantage
 5 Ways Tally Prime Reduces Cost and Boosts Productivity for Startups

CLB share transfer order flayed
March, 13th 2007
The order of the Company Law Board (CLB) directing the West Bengal Industrial Corporation (WBIDC) to transfer its 1.55 million shares in Haldia Petrochemical Ltd (HPL) to the Chatterjee Group lead by Purnendu Chatterjee was criticised by the Counsel of WBIDC before Mr Justice Jayanta Kumar Biswas of the Calcutta High Court today.

In his argument, the WBIDC counsel described the CLB order as a classic one, because there was no such prayer for transfer of shares before the CLB. The Chatterjee Group made an application before CLB under Section 397 of the Companies Act, under which the Board passed an order directing WBIDC to transfer 1.55 million shares in HPL to the TCG. Challenging this order, both the West Bengal Government and WBIDC filed two appeals in the Calcutta High Court.

The counsel for WBIDC questioned that under Section 397, shareholders of a company can file an application of mismanagement against the company, but surprisingly in the present case no allegation of mismanagement was made against HPL by the Chatterjee Group; hence, how the application under Section 397 has been entertained by the Board, it was pointed out. WBIDC was not willing to transfer the shares, the counsel argued. The order of CLB is perverse as it appeared from the totality of fact, the counsel submitted. The hearing will continue.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting