Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 M/s. M.L. Singhi & Associates (P) Ltd., Brahmaputra House, A-7, NH-8, Mahipalpur Crossing, Mahipalpur, New Delhi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-17, New Delhi.
 Gurudwara Kalgidhar Singh Sabha, R.K. Puram, Sector-6, Delhi Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Ward-1(2), New Delhi.
 Shri Bishan Sharup Gupta, New Delhi Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 45 (4), New Delhi.
 M/s Scan Holdings Pvt. Ltd., F-4, Shopping Complex, A Block, Meera Bagh, West Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle-22(2), New Delhi
 Shri Kunwar Tuli, 41A, A-1A, Chanakya Place, Uttam Nagar, Vs. ITO, Ward-43(4), New Delhi
 M/s. G4S Secure Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd., C-16, Community Centre, Janakpuri, Behind Janak Cinema, New Delhi Vs. Addl. CIT, Special Range-4, New Delhi
 Sh. Madhu Sudan Yadav, C/o Yadav Book Depot. Moti Chowk, Rewari, (Haryana) Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rewari.
 Sh. Madhu Sudan Yadav, C/o Yadav Book Depot. Moti Chowk, Rewari, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rewari.
 M/s. Transcend Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., S2 Level, Upper Ground Floor, Block-F, International Trade Tower, Nehru Place, New Delhi Vs. The ACIT, Circle-16(1), Central Revenue Building, New Delhi
 Rising Star Khilte Chehre 7/10, Pocket B Phase-3, Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. CIT (Exemption) New Delhi
 Smt. Harminder Kaur, C/o- Sunil Arora & Associates, A-1/118, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-36(4), New Delhi
 M/s. VLCC Health Care (P) Ltd. M 14, Commercial Complex Greater Kailash Part II, New Delhi Vs. Addl.CIT, Range 17, New Delhi.

Gurudwara Kalgidhar Singh Sabha, R.K. Puram, Sector-6, Delhi Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Ward-1(2), New Delhi.
February, 22nd 2021

This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-40, Delhi, Dated 23.08.2019, for the A.Y. 2011-2012, challenging the Order of the Ld. CIT(A) in wrongly interpreting the provisions of Section 10(23C)(v) of the I.T. Act, 1961.

We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing and perused the Orders of the authorities below.

The facts of the case are that as per Individual Transaction Statement, information in this case was received that assessee has received interest other than interest on securities under section 194A of Rs.41,344/- and rent under section 194I of Rs.4,75,200/- during assessment year under appeal. It was also observed that the assessee has not filed income tax return for the assessment year under appeal. The A.O. called for explanation of assessee. The assessee stated that it has not filed its return of income for the assessment year under appeal. The A.O. noted that assessee has not filed return of income and huge cash was deposited in its bank account. The A.O, therefore, initiated the re-assessment proceedings under section 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961 and after getting approval, issued notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961, which were duly served upon the assessee. The assessee in response to the notice under section 148, submitted return of income

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting