Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Saharanpur. Vs. Shri Ishtiyaque Ahmed through Legal Heirs Smt. Mushyada Begum, S/Shri Mohd. Azhar, Athar and Moyeen, 1/142, Mohalla Qureshian, Saharanpur
 ACIT, Central Circle 07, New Delhi. vs. M/s. R. J. Corp Ltd., F 2/7, Okhla Indl. Area, Phase I, New Delhi.
 Experion Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. F-9, First Floor, Manish Plaza 1, Plot No. 7, M. L. U, Sector-10, Dwarka Delhi Vs. ACIT Circle-8(2) New Delhi
 USK Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. E-172, DDA, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi Vs. ITO Ward-27(1) New Delhi
  Sh. Chakra Dhari Sureka, M-14B, South Extn. Part-II, New Delhi Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, New Delhi
 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, 299, DEEPALI ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 40(3), NEW DELHI
 B.M. Malhotra & Sons Ltd., C/o Kapil Goel, Advocate, F-26/124, Sector 7, Rohini, Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(1), New Delhi.
 The All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants vs. Union Of India (Gujarat High Court) (No. 2)
 Ravindera Hire Purchase & Finance E-1/58, Sector-11, Faridabad Haryana Vs. ITO Ward-2(2) Faridabad Haryana
 SSE Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 6926, FF, Jaipuria Mills, Clock Tower, Subzi Mandi, New Delhi. Vs. ITO Ward 24(2) C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
 NANAK RAM JAISINGHANI, C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, L-7A (LGF), SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2, NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 13(1), NEW DELHI

Anil Kumar Nehru vs. ACIT (Supreme Court)
February, 22nd 2019

S. 260A Condonation of delay of 1662 days: The High Court should not take a technical approach and refuse to condone the delay when appeals for earlier years with identical issues are already pending before it

It is a matter of record that on the identical issue raised by the appellant in respect of earlier assessment, the appeal is pending before the High Court. In these circumstances, the High Court should not have taken such a technical view of dismissing the appeal in the instant case on the ground of delay, when it has to decide the question of law between the parties in any case in respect of earlier assessment year. For this reason we set aside the order of the High Court; condone the delay for filing the appeal and direct to decide the appeal on merits.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting