Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

AP High Court stays Mahindra Satyam attachment order
February, 24th 2012

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has stayed the order of the Income-Tax Department that sought to attach properties of Mahindra Satyam in the Rs 617-crore tax demand issue

We have challenged the provisional order in the High Court. The court has granted the stay order after hearing the case, Mr G. Jayaraman, Company Secretary of Mahindra Satyam, told Business Line.

One January 30, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Range - 3, Hyderabad) served the order, attaching the land and buildings of Mahindra Satyam under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Incidentally, the company received an interim relief order from the same court on January 31 in the writ petitions filed by it, questioning the orders of Central Board of Direct Taxes and the draft assessment orders (for 2002-08 when the company witnessed massive financial fraud).

While posting the issue to February 28, the court asked the department not to encash the bank guarantee furnished by the company.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting