Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITR Filing 2025: These individuals are exempt from paying tax. Do they need to file returns?
 Full List Of Trump's Reciprocal Tariffs Announced Wednesday
 Top 5 tax-saving investment options for salaried individuals to consider before March 31, 2025
 5 lesser lesser-known avenues of tax saving you can use to save income tax before March 31, 2025
 March 15 is deadline for last advance tax installment: Know if you must pay

Don't expect tinkering with indirect taxes in Budget: PwC
February, 24th 2010

Barely two months after Mahindra Satyam agreed to pay $70 million to the UK-based mobile payment services firm Upaid in an out-of-court settlement, a fresh row has erupted between the two firms over a tax dispute. Seeking legal help this time, Mahindra Satyam, in a preemptive move, has moved a US court over the tax liabilities of the settlement amount.

The company on Tuesday said it has filed a lawsuit against Upaid in a New York court for a declaration that the settlement agreement is valid and enforceable.

Moreover, it has also sought a firm say on the tax liabilities rising from the settlement payment, including responsibility for complying with tax deduction requirements, from Upaid. Furthermore, it has also sought compensatory damages against Upaid in an amount to be determined during trial, it said.

According to sources placed in the company, the additional tax liabilities, if any, would run up to 0-40%, amounting to around $20 million whereas Satyam, in its announcement to the bourses, has said it has discharged its obligations under the settlement agreement and shall owe nothing further to Upaid.

Also, the company wants Upaid to declare that the disbursement of funds from the escrow account must be made in accordance with Indian law, including any requirement to deduct taxes from the settlement amounts prior to disbursement.

In the out-of-court settlement in December last year, Upaid had agreed to drop all charges against Mahindra Satyam and also provide a royalty-free licence on its patents on a worldwide and perpetual basis. The amount is, however, a tenth of what Upaid had earlier sought for damages from the erstwhile Satyam.

Mahindra Satyam also said it has already deposited the entire $70-million settlement amount into the escrow account provided for under the agreement.

Prior to the settlement, Upaid had filed the lawsuit in a Texas court seeking damages exceeding $1-billion, alleging forgery of documents necessary for transfer of proper title to its under an assignment agreement entered into in 1998, whereas, after the settlement, the Hyderabad-based company is entitled to receive from Upaid including the release of claims, licence of intellectual property and dismissal of pending litigation.

Even if we assume that Satyam has to shell out the additional tax liability, the company has much larger issues to handle and will not affect the operations and stock price, said Apurva Shah, head of research, Prabhudas Lilladher. On Tuesday, the companys scrip closed at Rs 96.85, up by 0.10% on the Bombay Stock Exchange.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting