BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 3247/Del/2017
Assessment Year : 2011-12
Appellant by : Sh. Sachin Jain, CA
Respondent by : Sh. Bhopal Singh, Sr. DR.
ITA NO. 3247/DEL/2017
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI FRIDAY BENCH ‘E’ : NEW DELHI (Through Video Conferencing)
BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
ITA No. 3247/Del/2017 Assessment Year : 2011-12
NANAK RAM JAISINGHANI, Vs. ITO, WARD 13(1),
C/O RAJ KUMAR & NEW DELHI
SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2,
NEW DELHI – 110 049
Appellant by : Sh. Sachin Jain, CA Respondent by : Sh. Bhopal Singh, Sr. DR.
PER H.S. SIDHU, JM :
The captioned appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order
of the Ld. CIT(A)-38, New Delhi for the assessment year 2011-12.
2. At the very outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the
Appellant has moved an Application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,
2020 to settle the dispute. ITA NO. 3247/DEL/2017
3. On such note, we dismiss the captioned appeal with the liberty to
the Appellant to approach the Tribunal for the revival of the appeal, if for
some reason the dispute is not settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas
4. With the above directions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Above decision was announced in the presence of both the partieson conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 13th January, 2021.
(PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (H.S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Copy forwarded to: -
5. DR, ITAT
Assistant RegistrarITA NO. 3247/DEL/2017