Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
  Sh. Chakra Dhari Sureka, M-14B, South Extn. Part-II, New Delhi Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, New Delhi
 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, 299, DEEPALI ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 40(3), NEW DELHI
 B.M. Malhotra & Sons Ltd., C/o Kapil Goel, Advocate, F-26/124, Sector 7, Rohini, Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(1), New Delhi.
 The All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants vs. Union Of India (Gujarat High Court) (No. 2)
 Ravindera Hire Purchase & Finance E-1/58, Sector-11, Faridabad Haryana Vs. ITO Ward-2(2) Faridabad Haryana
 SSE Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 6926, FF, Jaipuria Mills, Clock Tower, Subzi Mandi, New Delhi. Vs. ITO Ward 24(2) C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
 NANAK RAM JAISINGHANI, C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, L-7A (LGF), SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2, NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 13(1), NEW DELHI
 Satvinder Sethi C/o RRA TAXINDIA, D-28, South Extn., Part-1, New Delhi. Vs. ITO Ward 53(3), New Delhi.
 If company deducts TDS, it has to issue withholding tax certificate to employee
 Delhi High Court dismisses interim protection to person accused of Fraudulently availing IGST Refunds and ITC Credits
 DCIT, Circle : 16 (2), New Delhi. Vs. M/s. Prakausali Investment India (Pvt.) Ltd., C 41, Mayfair Garden, New Delhi
 The All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants vs. Union Of India (Gujarat High Court)
 M/s. Continental Engines Pvt. Ltd., 3rd Floor, Tower-D, Global Business Park, M.G. Road, Gurgaon Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-26, New Delhi
 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. OPG House, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi Vs. DCIT Circle 19 (1) New Delhi
 Rishikesh Sharma, C/-RRA TAXINDIA, D-28, South Extn. Part-1, New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle-59(1), New Delhi

NANAK RAM JAISINGHANI, C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, L-7A (LGF), SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2, NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 13(1), NEW DELHI
January, 13th 2021

BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

AND

SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 3247/Del/2017

Assessment Year : 2011-12

Appellant by : Sh. Sachin Jain, CA

Respondent by : Sh. Bhopal Singh, Sr. DR.

 

ITA NO. 3247/DEL/2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI FRIDAY BENCH ‘E’ : NEW DELHI
(Through Video Conferencing)

BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND

SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 3247/Del/2017
Assessment Year : 2011-12

NANAK RAM JAISINGHANI, Vs. ITO, WARD 13(1),

C/O RAJ KUMAR & NEW DELHI

ASSOCIATES,

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS,

L-7A (LGF),

SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2,

NEW DELHI – 110 049

(PAN: AAFPJ7461F)

(Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant by : Sh. Sachin Jain, CA
Respondent by : Sh. Bhopal Singh, Sr. DR.

ORDER

PER H.S. SIDHU, JM :

The captioned appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order

of the Ld. CIT(A)-38, New Delhi for the assessment year 2011-12.

2. At the very outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the

Appellant has moved an Application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,

2020 to settle the dispute.
ITA NO. 3247/DEL/2017

3. On such note, we dismiss the captioned appeal with the liberty to

the Appellant to approach the Tribunal for the revival of the appeal, if for

some reason the dispute is not settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas

Scheme, 2020.

4. With the above directions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Above decision was announced in the presence of both the parties
on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 13th January, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/-

(PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (H.S. SIDHU)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

SRB.

Copy forwarded to: -

1. Appellant

2. Respondent

3. CIT

4. CIT(A)

5. DR, ITAT

Assistant Registrar
ITA NO. 3247/DEL/2017

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting