Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

DCIT, Circle : 16 (2), New Delhi. Vs. M/s. Prakausali Investment India (Pvt.) Ltd., C 41, Mayfair Garden, New Delhi
January, 11th 2021


I.T.A. No. 3126/Del/2017 (A.Y 2010-11)


Appellant  by Ms. Sushma Singh [CIT] – DR

Respondent  by Ms. Kanika Jain, Adv.

This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 30.01.2017 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals]-7, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2010-11.

2. The grounds of appeal are as under:-

1. Whether on facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) is legally justified in deleting addition of Rs. 1,56,10,00,000/- u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) even when the assessee had failed to discharge its initial onus to prove the creditworthiness of the investors u/s 68 of the Act before Assessing Officer (the AO) as well before the Ld CIT(A)?


2. Whether on facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) is legally justified in deleting addition of Rs. 1,56,10,00,000/- u/s 68 of the Act by holding that creditworthiness of investors was proved by mere production of papers relating to identity of investors, copies of bank statement, use of banking channel, confirmations and KYC forms of some of the investors, proof of TDS by ignoring the ratio decidendi as laid down by Hon’ble Delhi High Court on the issue in the cases of CIT vs. N.R. Portfolio (P) Ltd. (2014) 2 ITR-OL-68, CIT vs. Nipun Builders and Developers (P) Ltd. (2013) 350 ITR 407 and CIT vs. Navodaya Castles Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 367 ITR 306 on application of section 68 of the Act?

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting