Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
  Sh. Chakra Dhari Sureka, M-14B, South Extn. Part-II, New Delhi Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, New Delhi
 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, 299, DEEPALI ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 40(3), NEW DELHI
 B.M. Malhotra & Sons Ltd., C/o Kapil Goel, Advocate, F-26/124, Sector 7, Rohini, Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(1), New Delhi.
 The All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants vs. Union Of India (Gujarat High Court) (No. 2)
 Ravindera Hire Purchase & Finance E-1/58, Sector-11, Faridabad Haryana Vs. ITO Ward-2(2) Faridabad Haryana
 SSE Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 6926, FF, Jaipuria Mills, Clock Tower, Subzi Mandi, New Delhi. Vs. ITO Ward 24(2) C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
 NANAK RAM JAISINGHANI, C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, L-7A (LGF), SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2, NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 13(1), NEW DELHI
 Satvinder Sethi C/o RRA TAXINDIA, D-28, South Extn., Part-1, New Delhi. Vs. ITO Ward 53(3), New Delhi.
 If company deducts TDS, it has to issue withholding tax certificate to employee
 Delhi High Court dismisses interim protection to person accused of Fraudulently availing IGST Refunds and ITC Credits
 DCIT, Circle : 16 (2), New Delhi. Vs. M/s. Prakausali Investment India (Pvt.) Ltd., C 41, Mayfair Garden, New Delhi
 The All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants vs. Union Of India (Gujarat High Court)
 M/s. Continental Engines Pvt. Ltd., 3rd Floor, Tower-D, Global Business Park, M.G. Road, Gurgaon Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-26, New Delhi
 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. OPG House, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi Vs. DCIT Circle 19 (1) New Delhi
 Rishikesh Sharma, C/-RRA TAXINDIA, D-28, South Extn. Part-1, New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle-59(1), New Delhi

DCIT, Circle : 16 (2), New Delhi. Vs. M/s. Prakausali Investment India (Pvt.) Ltd., C 41, Mayfair Garden, New Delhi
January, 11th 2021

BEFORE SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

I.T.A. No. 3126/Del/2017 (A.Y 2010-11)

(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Appellant  by Ms. Sushma Singh [CIT] – DR

Respondent  by Ms. Kanika Jain, Adv.

This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 30.01.2017 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals]-7, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2010-11.

2. The grounds of appeal are as under:-

1. Whether on facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) is legally justified in deleting addition of Rs. 1,56,10,00,000/- u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) even when the assessee had failed to discharge its initial onus to prove the creditworthiness of the investors u/s 68 of the Act before Assessing Officer (the AO) as well before the Ld CIT(A)?

 

2. Whether on facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) is legally justified in deleting addition of Rs. 1,56,10,00,000/- u/s 68 of the Act by holding that creditworthiness of investors was proved by mere production of papers relating to identity of investors, copies of bank statement, use of banking channel, confirmations and KYC forms of some of the investors, proof of TDS by ignoring the ratio decidendi as laid down by Hon’ble Delhi High Court on the issue in the cases of CIT vs. N.R. Portfolio (P) Ltd. (2014) 2 ITR-OL-68, CIT vs. Nipun Builders and Developers (P) Ltd. (2013) 350 ITR 407 and CIT vs. Navodaya Castles Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 367 ITR 306 on application of section 68 of the Act?

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting