Tally for Practicing CAs Gold Edition (Multi User) Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax | PPE Safety Kit SITRA Approved | PPE Safety Kit
From the Courts »
 Ganapati Breweries Ltd., UG-03, An Sal Majestic Tower, Plot No.17, G Block, Commercial Complex, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018 Vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), New Delhi
 Mitsui & Co. Ltd. Plot No. D1, 4th Floor, Selcon Ras Vilas, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi vs. DDIT (International Taxation) Circle-3(1) New Delhi.
 Sh. Alok Swarup, C/o-M/s Malik & Co.(Adv.) 305/7, Thapar Nagar, Meerut City, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Aayakar Bhawan, Meerut Road, Muzaffarnagar
 Shri Sanjay Sharma 418, Imperial Block, Supertech Estate Sector 9, Vaishali, Ghaziabad Vs. The A.C.I.T Circle 59(1) New Delhi.
 Nawal Kishore Soni vs. ACIT
 PCIT vs. Gulbrandsen Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
 Delhi HC dismisses RSSB chief Gurinder Singh Dhillon's application seeking not to put ITR on record
 The Dy. CIT, Circle 11(1), Room No.405, C.R. Building, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. Ebony Retail Holdings Ltd., F-2/1, Khanpur Extension, New Delhi
 M/s PAD COM LLP C/o. R.B.Arora & Co., DSM- 127, DLF Towers, ShivajiMarg, Moti Nagar, New Delhi Vs. ACIT Circle-36(1) New Delhi
 M/s. Jupiter Healthcare Co. F-11, Naveen Shahadra, New Delhi Vs. The ACIT, Circle 56(1), New Delhi.
 Gayatri Seva Sansthan, 155, G.T. Road, Panchwati, Ghaziabad. Vs. Addl. CIT, Range 1, Ghaziabad.

M/s. HFCL Satellite Communications Ltd. 8, Commercial Complex, Masjid Moth, Greater Kailash Part-II, New Delhi 110 048. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, New Delhi
January, 07th 2015
                     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                         DELHI BENCHES : "C" NEW DELHI


             BEFORE SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                   AND SHRI A.T. VARKEY , JUDICIAL MEMBER


                                 ITA Nos. 3162,3163/Del/2013
                                  Asstt. Years 2003-04, 2005-06

       M/s. HFCL Satellite Communications Ltd.     vs. Deputy Commissioner of
       8, Commercial Complex, Masjid Moth,            Income Tax, Central Circle-1,
       Greater Kailash Part-II,                        New Delhi
       New Delhi ­ 110 048.
        (PAN AAACH2447K)
              (Appellant)                                    (Respondent)


                        Appellant by   :Shri M.P. Rastogi, Advocate
                        Respondent     :Shri Satpal Singh, Sr. DR


                              ORDER

PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER



       This is an appeal filed by the Ld. CIT (A) ­X dated 12.3.2013 for the

assessment year 2003-04.


2.     We have heard Shri M.P. Rastogi, Ld. Counsel for the assesee and Shri Satpal

Singh, Ld. SR. DR.


3.      On a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and a

perusal of the papers on record and the orders of the authorities below, we hold as

follows :-







3.1.    The assesee in this case has demonstrated that it was prevented sufficient

cause from appearing before the first appellate authority.
                                                            ITA. Nos.3162,3163/Del/2013
                                              M/s. HFCL Satellite Communication Ltd. vs. DCIT



4.      The first appellate authority should have disposed off the case on merit

instead of dismissing the appeal as infructuous. We do not understand how the first

appellate authority came to the conclusion that the assessee has affectively

withdrawn the appeal. Thus, we set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) and

restore the matter to the file of the first appeal authority for fresh adjudication in

accordance with law.







5.     In the result the appeals of the assesee are allowed for statistical purposes.


       Order pronounced in the Open Court on 6th January,2015.


          sd/-                                     sd/-
          (A.T. VARKEY)                         (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
        JUDICIAL MEMBER                       ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


 Dated:            6th January, 2015
`veena'
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR
6.    Guard File

                                                              By Order


                                                              Deputy Registrar




                                                                                                2

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us | PPE Kit SITRA Approved | PPE Safety Kit
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting