Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Service Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Government Proposes Tax Relief for Offshore Funds and Electronics Contract Manufacturing: Key Changes Explained
 Income Tax Refund Adjustment Against Old Tax Demands: What AY 2026–27 Taxpayers Should Know Before Claiming a Refund
 ITR filing 2026: Here are the 7 income tax notices you may receive after filing your return and what they mean
 ITR filed and verified? Here's how the Income Tax Department spots mismatches—and when it sends a notice
 ITR Filing 2026: CBDT Introduces 6 Major E-Filing Portal Upgrades Ahead of Peak Tax Return Filing Season
 ITR Filing 2026: Sold Shares, Property or Crypto? Key Tax Rules You Must Know Before Filing Your Income Tax Return
 ITR filing 2026 Secondary address field is now mandatory here s how it can help taxpayers
 New GST Rates: When will changes in GST rates take effect? What's the GST on medicines? | Top FAQs answered
 New Income Tax Bill 2025: 3 key changes that could make ITR filing easier
 Tax e-filing: New banks enabled for online tax payments via e-pay tax service Check the entire list of banks
 Income Tax Bill 2025: Changes under the new bill that taxpayers must know. Check FAQs

High Court: MTNL can't levy service tax on bill after discount
January, 05th 2011

The Bombay high court has significantly ruled that Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) cannot charge service tax after deducting discount from the bi-monthly rental bill under its Own Your Telephone (OYT) scheme.

According to petitioner Sanjay Kothari, under the scheme he paid an advance lump sum of Rs5,000 and was entitled to a reduction of Rs40 on the bi-monthly bill for 20 years. He said that the bi-monthly rental is Rs340, and under the Finance Act, 1994 five per cent service tax is chargeable on the gross bill. His advocate argued that while Kothari is liable to pay service tax of Rs17 on a rental of Rs340, MTNL is charging service tax of Rs19, taking the rental as Rs380. He urged for a refund of the excess service tax taken from him.

MTNL submitted that Kotharis bi-monthly rental is Rs380 and Rs40 is given as a rebate because he made an initial deposit of Rs5,000. And as he enjoys this concession of Rs40, MTNL is entitled to claim service tax on Rs380.

The division bench of justice DK Deshmukh and justice ND Deshpande in their December 21, 2010 order said the whole debate is whether the amount of Rs5,000, which was paid by the petitioner at the time of taking the connection, is a deposit or payment. The judges said if it is to be treated as a deposit then the concession of Rs40 will have to be taken into consideration while calculating the total rental payable by Kothari.

On the other hand, if it is to be treated as payment, Rs340 will be taken as the total rental payable by Kothari.

The judges noted that perusal of the scheme shows that the subscriber does not make any deposit. He pays an initial lump sum towards the rentals and hence he is allowed reduction in the annual rentals for a specified period. It is thus clear that the initial payment made by the subscriber is not a deposit. It is a payment of rentals which entitles him to specified reduction in the annual rentals for a specified period, the judges wrote. They concluded that Kothari is right in contending that for the purpose of charging service tax, Rs340 is the amount of bi-monthly rentals and not Rs380.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting