Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITAT Cuts ?4.85 Lakh Penalty After ?14.02 Lakh Interest Income Was Missed in ITR
 ITR filed under old regime, tax calculated under new regime; Delhi ITAT gives taxpayer relief
 ITAT Delhi Quashes Tax Notice on AMU PG Student’s ?18.34 Lakh Stipend, Declares It Tax-Free Under Section 10(16)
 Advance tax deadline September 15: What happens if you missed the previous instalment payment?
 How much gold jewellery can you keep at home? Nagpur ITAT explains rules on ownership, gifts, taxability
 ?5.31 lakh TDS refund allowed by ITAT Delhi: Why absence of an original ITR did not block the taxpayer
 Missed the ITR Filing Deadline? How to Claim Your Income Tax Refund and Correct Mistakes Before December 31, 2026
 GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)
 GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)
 GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)
 Income-Tax Department Moves to Bring Greater Certainty to International Tax Cases

SC dismisses plea against Satyam
January, 05th 2010

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the Company Law Boards order facilitating takeover of the scam-tainted Satyam Computers by the Mahindra group and allowed the IT firm to go ahead with the process to rope in a strategic investor through a public auction. A Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan dismissed the petition filed by an advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, who claimed to be a shareholder of the company.

Stating that the CLB had no powers to acquire forcefully controlling/ownership right of the shareholder of the company without its consent, Sharma sought stay on the auction of Satyams share on the ground that the government-appointed board of the company had taken a unilateral decision to sell the stake to a third party without convening any general meeting of the shareholders.

The petition also said no meeting of the shareholders of the fraud-hit company had been called so far for any kind of reference and approvals, which was illegal.

All actions based on the CLB order of February 19, 2009, must be stayed with immediate effect, the petition said.

According to the petitioner, a company having Rs 1,800 crore receivable in hand and fixed assets of Rs 2,038 crore with no creditors and annual services fees of foreign currency return worth Rs 6,000 crore had been sold out in the hand of the third party at a throwaway price.

However, solicitor-general Gopal Subramanium opposed the petition saying Sharmas plea was earlier dismissed by the Delhi High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court and even the apex court.

He alleged that Sharma had no shares when the Satyam scam was unearthed but had later purchased its shares.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting