« Top Headlines » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  ITAT Cuts ?4.85 Lakh Penalty After ?14.02 Lakh Interest Income Was Missed in ITR  ITR filed under old regime, tax calculated under new regime; Delhi ITAT gives taxpayer relief  ITAT Delhi Quashes Tax Notice on AMU PG Student’s ?18.34 Lakh Stipend, Declares It Tax-Free Under Section 10(16)  Advance tax deadline September 15: What happens if you missed the previous instalment payment?  How much gold jewellery can you keep at home? Nagpur ITAT explains rules on ownership, gifts, taxability  ?5.31 lakh TDS refund allowed by ITAT Delhi: Why absence of an original ITR did not block the taxpayer  Missed the ITR Filing Deadline? How to Claim Your Income Tax Refund and Correct Mistakes Before December 31, 2026  GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)  GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)  GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)  Income-Tax Department Moves to Bring Greater Certainty to International Tax Cases «  UT nets in Rs 575 cr as Income Tax... Vacant properties rebate may go... » Simplify tax structure: Mahratta Chamber January, 24th 2007 Simplification and rationalisation of procedural aspect of taxation are among the salient demands made by the Mahratta Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture (MCCIA) in its pre-budget memorandum submitted to the finance minister.    The memorandum, prepared by Chandrashekgar Chitale, head of chambers taxation sub-committee, seeks abolition of bank cash transaction tax, restoration of standard deduction, removal of harsh provisions of the TDS norms and a complete withdrawl of the fringe benefit tax.    Pointing out that the rationale behind the bank cash transaction tax was to create a tax-trail on black money transactions through the banking channel, the memorandum said information can always be collected without imposing a tax.    The memorandum has demanded that to maintain the principle of deducting expenses from corresponding heads of income, standard deduction should be restored. Besides, the limit for deduction should be Rs 50,000.    The memorandum also sought removal of the provision that disallows deduction of expenditure of fees paid for professional services from an assessees income, unless tax is deducted from the fees paid.    The person deducting the tax at source and paying the amount is, in fact, doing a service to the government.    Thus to penalise him by refusing the deduction of the expenditure even for a small default is not justified, it stated.    Delay of even one day in filing of return of loss deprives benefit of carry forward of loss. This, according to the chamber, is a confiscatory provision, adding salt to the injury.    The memorandum has demanded that a total bar on carry forward be removed. The chamber has recommended increase in the value of asset that qualifies for 100 per cent deduction from Rs 5000 now to Rs 20,000.