Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties
 M/s. InterGlobe Aviation Ltd., Ground Floor, Central Wing, Thapar House, 124 Janpath, New Delhi Vs. JCIT, Special Range : 4, New Delhi.
 Chatru Mal Garg Plot No.98, Sector 25, Faridabad, Haryana Vs. ACIT Circle 1 Faridabad
 Baxter India Pvt.Ltd., 5th Floor, Tower-A, Bldg.9, DLF Cyber City, DLF Phase-II, Gurgaon, Haryana Vs. ITO, Ward-4(1), New Delhi.
 Sh. Ankit Kapoor, B-102, R.G. City Centre, Plot No. 4, Motia Khan, Paharganj, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-63(4), New Delhi

Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
December, 08th 2021

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has moved the Supreme Court against a service tax demand raised by the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) department. The Supreme Court registered the case on December 2, the official website showed.

The capital markets regulator has been involved in a prolonged battle with the CGST department of Mumbai. The case pertains to two tax notices sent by the CGST commissioner, demanding ₹130 crore from Sebi in service tax dues.

Sebi collects fees from various market intermediaries including stock exchanges, brokerages and clearing corporations. This is in the form of either registration fees or licence fees. The erstwhile service tax department, which has now been merged into the CGST department, sent the tax notices to Sebi in March 2016.

The tax department alleged that the fees collected by Sebi from market participants must be subject to a 14% service tax. Accordingly, it asked the regulator to cough up a service tax of ₹75.2 crore in the first notice and an additional ₹55 crore in the second notice. These notices were for the fees collected by Sebi during the period 2012-2016.

Sebi has argued that the money it receives is exempt from any service tax since it is a statutory body. An email sent to Sebi remained unanswer ..

Lawyers said Sebi must not be asked to pay service tax for the fees it collects. "These are sovereign functions and statutory levies as per various regulations and there is no service being rendered by Sebi to the market institutions for the fees collected. In fact, Sebi is just discharging its obligations as a statutory body," said Abhishek Rastogi, partner, Khaitan & Co. "In legal terminology, there is the absence of 'quid pro quo' and hence the absence of any service element."

The CGST Commissioner, however, did not agree with Sebi's argument and passed orders against the market regulator. In 2018, Sebi filed an appeal against the order at Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESAT), Mumbai. In June 2020, CESAT ruled in favour of the tax department. Sebi has appealed this order.


Back in 2016, then Sebi chairman UK Sinha moved the finance ministry against the tax notices. In the Union Budget for FY17, the government provided an explicit exemption for regulators including Sebi and the IRDAI from the burden of service tax. However, the amendments didn't address the existing litigation.

"While the government proactively brought an amendment to remove doubts, it was introduced prospectively, which meant that the dues from earlier years were not exempt," said a leading tax lawyer on condition of anonymity. "The apex court will now have to render an interpretation. Similar cases are pending in the mining sector as well."

Sebi wanted the amendments to be introduced retrospectively. However, the government has not provided any further clarification. Under the Finance Act, 1994, any entity that is part of the so-called 'negative list' is exempt from service tax. Most government agencies fall under this negative list, which has been one of Sebi's arguments.

 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting