Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 M/s Singh Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. 1106 Indra Prakash Building, 21 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(4), New Delhi
 Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable if reason not specified: ITAT
 Notice issued u/s 143(2) to be served upon the assessee within six months: ITAT
 Addition for Unexplained Cash Credit justified in respect of Unexplained Creditors shown as Bogus: ITAT
 Input Service Tax Credit is deductible u/s.37(1) when such Input Tax Credit is written off in Books of Accounts: ITAT
 ITAT allows Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) on Account of Donation
 ITAT can t dismiss application merely on the basis of seeking frequent adjournments: Delhi High Court
 Society registered outside India not eligible for Income Tax Exemption: ITAT
 ITAT stays recovery of outstanding Tax Arrears to the tune of Rs.1260.56 Crores against Google India
 ITAT confirms disallowance of Advertisement Expenses relating to Construction of Swimming Pool Setback to Himalaya
 ITAT grants relief to Atos India Assessment framed for Non-Existent Authority is null & Void
 Capital Gain Deduction claim can be invoked during Re-Assessment if Assessee failed to file Returns: ITAT
 Vodafone Idea Limited is not required to Deduct Tax u/s 194H on Prepaid SIM Cards: ITAT
 Activities performed in ‘Virtual Classrooms’ also comes under the Definition of ‘Education’: ITAT grants relief to NIIT Foundation
 Scrutiny Assessment without Notice is Defective in Law: ITAT

ITAT stays recovery of outstanding Tax Arrears to the tune of Rs.1260.56 Crores against Google India
December, 14th 2020

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench stayed the recovery of outstanding tax arrears to the tune of Rs.1260.56 Crores against Google India.

Originally the stay was granted by the Tribunal for a period of six months. As per the original stay order of the Tribunal, the assessee was directed to pay Rs.15 crore towards the outstanding tax demand within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order.

 

The assessee, Google India had complied with the conditions mentioned by the Tribunal for the grant of stay. Later, the stay against recovery of outstanding tax arrears was extended.

By the second order of stay, the recovery of outstanding demand was stayed for a period of six months or till the disposal of the appeal whichever is earlier.

The appeal was posted for hearing on October 8, 2020, however, the same was adjourned by the Bench to January 5, 2021 to await the outcome of the preceding year pending adjudication before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.

 

The Coram consisting of George George K. and B.R. Baskaran held that the assessee has already complied with the conditions mentioned in the stay orders passed by the Tribunal.

Therefore, the ITAT opined that the stay needs to be extended for a further period of six months or till the disposal of the appeal whichever is earlier.


Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting