Delhi High Court allows SRF Limited to File Revised Returns for Fourth Quarter of the year 2015-16 under DVAT Read more at: https://www.taxscan.in/delhi-high-court-allows-srf-limited-to-file-revised-returns-for-fourth-quarter-of-the-year-2015-16-under-dvat-read-order/89980/ Delhi High Court allows SRF Limited to File Revised Returns for Fourth Quarter of the year 2015-16 under DVAT Read more at: https://www.taxscan.in/delhi-high-court-allows-srf-limited-to-file-revised-returns-for-fourth-quarter-of-the-year-2015-16-under-dvat-read-order/89980/ Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

� From the Courts »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
[Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court


� M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, C/O SH. KAPIL GOEL, ADVOCATE,...	Mrs. Sushila Jagnani, 30, Harsh Vihar, Pitampura, New Delhi... »
Delhi High Court allows SRF Limited to File Revised Returns for Fourth Quarter of the year 2015-16 under DVAT Read more at: https://www.taxscan.in/delhi-high-court-allows-srf-limited-to-file-revised-returns-for-fourth-quarter-of-the-year-2015-16-under-dvat-read-order/89980/

December, 18th 2020
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to File Revised Returns for Fourth Quarter of the year 2015-16 under Delhi Value Added Tax (DVAT). The petitioner, SRF Limited requested for issuance of Form ‘F’, which has been rejected by the adjudicating authority on the ground that the dealer did not rectify the error in the returns within the specified time period. The Petitioner prayed for a direction to the respondent to issue Forms ‘F’ pertaining to fourth quarter of the year 2015-16 to the petitioner company. The counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sudhir Sangal stated that while filing its returns for the fourth quarter of the year 2015-2016, out of the total inwards stock received on stock transfer basis, the petitioner had erroneously omitted to include goods of the value of Rs. 1,75,01,990 against eight stock transfer invoices from Bharuch. It was submitted that having discovered the aforesaid mistake, the petitioner approached DVAT Department, Delhi to seek permission to amend the revised return so as to enable it to download Forms F for the Quarter ending March 31, 2016; the impugned order was passed wherein it was stated that the time limit to file the revised return had already expired and that Petitioner cannot be permitted to revise the returns. On the other hand, Mr. Satyakam, Standing counsel for the respondents submitted that this Court has recently in similar matters been either adjourning matters or is allowing the petition but suspending the relief till the civil appeals pending in the Supreme Court are decided. The court consisting of Justice Manmohan and Sanjeev Narula no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending. Consequently, directed the respondent authority to allow the amendment sought for by the petitioner in its return of fourth quarter of Year 2015-16. However, the court stated that this direction shall remain suspended till the Civil Appeals pending before the Supreme Court, taken note of hereinabove, are decided and this direction shall abide by the decision that the Supreme Court renders.