Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Delhi HC Rules GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without a Clear Show Cause Notice (SCN)
 Belated income tax return AY 2026-27: How to file, late filing charges and what you may lose
 Major Financial Changes from August 1, 2026: ITR Deadline, RBI MPC Meeting, Tatkal Ticket Rules & More
 Government proposes to ease tax relief conditions for offshore funds
 TallyPrime Connected Banking: Automating Banking and Accounting
 ITR Filing Deadline 2026: Is July 31 the Last Date to File Your Income Tax Return? Latest Official Update
 ITR filing deadline nears: How to file income tax return online on e-filing portal - quick 15-step guide
 Will the ITR Filing Deadline Be Extended Beyond July 31 for FY 2025-26? Here's the Latest Update for Taxpayers
 Income Tax Refund Delayed for AY 2026-27? 5 Common Reasons Your Refund May Be Stuck and How to Fix It
 ITR Filing 2026: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Asks Tax Officials to Let Honest Taxpayers Correct Genuine Mistakes
 Will Your FCNR Deposit Stay Tax-Free After Returning to India? Tax Rules Explained for NRIs

CBEC order to reopen cases where Tax demand stayed
December, 03rd 2009

Directions form part of revenue maximisation measures.

The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has directed its field formations across the country to open all cases, irrespective of year and amount involved, where it had raised a demand but had these stayed by courts, otherwise known as call-book cases.

The directions form part of revenue maximisation measures by the department through ways other than tax collection in this financial year.

Usually, the tax demand raised by the department gets stayed in courts or at appellate levels in the department itself. Officials involved in the exercise said the new directive it will have wide implication for revenue, since the Board estimates about Rs 30,000 crore was stuck in such cases as on June 30. Thus, if such cases are reviewed and demand is raised before March 31, 2010, it will add to revenue collection substantially.

This is a major step to maximise revenue at a time when indirect tax collections have dipped due to lower tax rates fixed for companies following fiscal stimulus by the government to help industry recover. The objective of this exercise is to avert a stay, so that the assessee pays first and then fights the demand in court if it so prefers, said an official. Officials added that the department is expected to finish opening up all cases and serve demand notices to the companies before March 31.

Other than the call book cases, the board has also directed all chief commissioners to scrutinise all cases where the demand is more than Rs 50 lakh, irrespective of the year in which it was booked, and has not been recovered due to litigation.

In such cases, after the review, the department will fix fresh demand and then serve notice for recovery. As a one-time measure, the board has also proposed that departments review all cases where demand is difficult to revover or non-recoverable cases, for writeoff by the authority concerned and recover whatever dues are possible.

The Board, in a note to the departments, has observed that 90 per cent of the cases get stayed in the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Cestat).

Therefore the board had suggested empanelling counsels of repute, seeking a designated bench in courts for early decisions and a two-member review committee of chief commisioners to decide on Cestat orders before filing an appeal in the High Court or Supreme Court.

The note says there are 61,200 cases involving an arrear demand of Rs 31,500 crore as on June 30, 2009. In this, 20 per cent of cases accounting for 38 per cent of revenue got a stay, 32 per cent of cases with 34 per cent of revenue were restrained by the debt recovery tribunal, 12 per cent of cases with four per cent of revenue were non-recoverable, while revenue could be recovered from 36 per cent of cases accounting for 24 per cent of revenue without any additional burden.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting