Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Why you should file your income tax returns before July 31
 What is Form 26AS? How to download Form 26AS to file Income Tax Return (ITR)
 Income Tax Return: What are the alternatives to Form 16 that can be used while filing ITR?
 What should you do if your Form 16 data doesn't match your ITR prefilled form?
 Check your Form 26AS, AIS carefully for error-free income tax return filing
 10 ITR filing mistakes which can cost taxpayers dearly
 Income Tax Return (ITR) Filing Deadlines FY 2023-24: A Quick Guide for Different Taxpayers
 ITR Filing FY24: 6 key points taxpayers must know as July 31 deadline looms large
 Tax Savings: How working women can save tax and get good returns | Check best options
 Income tax department notifies cost inflation index for current fiscal
 I-T dept notifies cost inflation index for FY25 to compute capital gains

Withholding tax on tax-free remittances
December, 04th 2006

A plain reading of Section 195 of the Income-tax Act shows that any person responsible for paying to a foreign company (i) any interest or (ii) any other sum chargeable under the provisions of the Act (except salary), is required to deduct income-tax at the time of credit of such sum to the account of the payee or at the time of actual payment thereof, whichever is earlier. Non-compliance of the above provision leads to disallowance of expenditure in the hands of the payer [see Section 40 (a)(i)]. 
 
The issue for consideration is whether it is mandatory to make application to Income Tax Department under Section 195 even if the amount to be remitted is not liable to tax. In a recent case of IMT Labs (AAR 676 of 2005), the Authority for Advance Rulings held that scheme of tax deduction at source applies not only to the amount paid, which wholly bears income character, but also to gross sums, the whole of which may not be income or profits of the recipient. In this regard, the authority relied on the decision of Supreme Court in case of Transmission Corporation of AP Ltd vs CIT (239 ITR 587). 
 
Earlier, in case of Al Nisr Publishing (239 ITR 879), the Authority for Advance Rulings had expressed a entirely contrary opinion. On the question whether the advertising revenue remitted out of India by the agent(s) of the applicant is subject to deduction of tax at source under Section 195 or any other provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Authority held that the remitter of money was not required to deduct tax at source. 
 
It was observed that the commission received in India is not taxable in the hands of the applicant in view of Article 7 read with Article 5 of the DTAA. There is, therefore, no obligation to deduct tax at source from the remittances made to the non-resident applicant. 
 
Furthermore, in several cases, the different benches of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal have held that if the payment made to non-resident is not chargeable to tax, the provisions of Section 195 are not attracted. In Lufthansa Cargo India (P) Ltd 91 ITD 133, the tribunal, relying on the apex courts decision in Transmission Corporation (supra), held as under: The language of Section 195 (1) is unambiguous on the subject. 
 
It is only such sums which are chargeable under the provisions of this Act (not being income chargeable under the head Salaries) that come within the purview of Section 195. If the payment is not chargeable to tax, the provisions of Section 195 are not attracted. 
 
In this context, it will also be relevant to note that earlier no remittance out of India was allowed unless a no objection certificate was obtained from the Income-tax Department. This procedure has been amended vide Circular No. 759 dated November 18, 1997. 
 
Under the revised procedure, remittance can be made on the basis of a CA Certificate. It is, therefore, felt that the Supreme Court case discussed above will not be applicable after amendment of the procedure. 
 
It is, however, curious that the decision of the apex court in Transmission Corporation (supra) is being referred to both in favour of the proposition and also for against the proposition. 
 
Therefore, it is necessary that the contradiction in judicial interpretation of Section 195 should be quickly resolved because the same is creating great amount of confusion to foreign enterprises doing business in India.

H P Aggarwal

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting