Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 How to file ITR as an OCI on Indian income?
 4 income tax benefits you could expect from Budget 2023
 10 key steps to plan your taxes in 2023 Income Tax
 Clarification for the purposes of clause (c) of Section 269ST of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
 How to save income tax under various sections in FY 22-23?
 5 tax-saving techniques for FY23 Here is what experts suggest
  Tax moves to make before end of 2022 Your Money
 Income Tax Dept Exempts Non-Resident Taxpayers From Filing Form10F For Now
 Hedging of Commodity Price Risk and Freight Risk in Overseas Markets (Reserve Bank) Directions
 Master Direction Foreign Exchange Management (Hedging of Commodity Price Risk and Freight Risk in Overseas Markets) Directions, 2022

Taxman makes a case for netting foreign BPOs here
December, 08th 2006

Challenging a finding of the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), the department of income tax (DIT) has told the Supreme Court that it has a right to tax a slice of the global income of Morgan Stanley on the ground that Morgan Stanleys BPO operations in India, constituting a permanent establishment (PE), perform an integral role in its securities trading operations.

The affidavit comes in response to a counter petition moved by the US- based investment bank Morgan Stanley, opposing the petition of the DIT. Morgan Stanley had filed the counter appeal after DIT challenged a decision of the Authority for Advance Ruling, to the effect that Morgan Stanley was not liable for taxation in India as its transactions with the Indian BPO were at arms length.

The apex court is examining whether the petitions, the one filed by the department and the counter appeal by Morgan Stanley, are to be admitted or not.

Till the Supreme Court comes out with its decision, DITs stance would discourage American companies from setting up captive BPOs in India.

International taxation is still at a nebulous stage in India and the Supreme Courts decision in the matter will become a major precedent, said Salil Gupta, director, KPMG.

The AAR had conceded that Morgan Stanleys BPO, Morgan Stanley Advantage Services (MSAS), constitutes a service PE. However, since its transactions were at arms length, Morgan Stanleys global income did not come under the purview of Indian tax. DIT has challenged this attribution of income using the principle of force of attraction. Because the BPO acts as the back office without whose services Morgan Stanley would not be able to carry out its securities business, the department believes that the force of attraction principle applies. This, the AAR has overlooked, claims DIT.

Challenging the AAR ruling, the department said the Morgan Stanley was providing services to MSAS which amounted to a service PE in India. The department has also raised the issue of control over the place of working. If the BPO premises are under the control of the parent company which uses it for its own business, it shall be treated as PE.

However, the US-based investment company is yet to file its reply to the notice issued by the Supreme Court on the DIT petition.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting