Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITR filing 2023-24: How to optimise Section 80D deductions at the time of filing tax returns
 ITR filing 2023-24: Top 7 mistakes to avoid for hassle-free income-tax return filing this year
 Income tax returns for FY 2023-24: Keep these 8 tax law changes in mind while filing ITR this year
 ITR Filing 2024: Know who can and cannot file income tax returns using ITR-1 this year
 Income Tax Filing: 10 necessary guidelines that you must be aware of
 Why you should file your income tax returns before July 31
 What is Form 26AS? How to download Form 26AS to file Income Tax Return (ITR)
 Income Tax Return: What are the alternatives to Form 16 that can be used while filing ITR?
 What should you do if your Form 16 data doesn't match your ITR prefilled form?
 Check your Form 26AS, AIS carefully for error-free income tax return filing
 10 ITR filing mistakes which can cost taxpayers dearly

Cirumstances at time of will execution crucial: SC
December, 26th 2006

The Supreme Court has held that for a will to be valid, signature of the testator alone would not be sufficient and it also has also to be proved that he/she was in proper state of mind at the time of making the will.

"The propounder is required to prove that testator has signed the will, and he had put his signature out of his own free will having a sound disposition of mind," said a bench comprising of Justices S B Sinha and Markandey Katju.

The case involved the Will of Umeshchandra Joshi, owner of Ramtirth Brahmi Hair Oil company, who had seven sons and three daughters but he had bequeathed all his property on his second son, depriving the rest.

The will was drafted in the ICU of a hospital where he was undergoing treatment. He was being treated by a doctor who was a student of the beneficiary. The will was executed in the presence of two witnesses who were also close to the beneficiary.

Family members who were deprived questioned the genuineness of the Will and accused the beneficary of playing fraud on family members.

Raising suspicion on the cirumstances surrounding the will a division Judge Bench of High Court held that the witnesses to the will are interested persons, and evidence adduced in support of execution of the will was unsatifactory.

Upholding the verdict of High Court, the Supreme Court also took notice of the meticulously drafted bill and held "When he was admitted in ICU, he would not be permitted to carry documents. It is unnatural that he would remember all the detail of his assets."

"An inference can, therefore, be safely drawn that Appellant (Beneficiary) had a role to play in execution of the will," the bench held.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting