Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Mastering Online Income Tax Return Filing: Step-by-Step Guide For Easy ITR Filing
 Notification No. 27/2023 CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
 How to calculate income tax on stock market earnings along with your salary?
 10 things to remember while investing in tax saving fixed deposits (FDs)
 How HRA exemption can help you save tax in 2023-24
 Filing ITR On Your Own? A Senior Income Tax Expert Suggests This
 Income tax return filing for FY22-23: Form 16 issue date, ITR forms and more
 Notification No. 22/2023 CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
 Four tax-saving tools for your investment portfolio
 How to decide which Income Tax Regime is good for you in FY 2023-24
 How to maximise your tax refund: Strategies for smart filing

Cirumstances at time of will execution crucial: SC
December, 26th 2006

The Supreme Court has held that for a will to be valid, signature of the testator alone would not be sufficient and it also has also to be proved that he/she was in proper state of mind at the time of making the will.

"The propounder is required to prove that testator has signed the will, and he had put his signature out of his own free will having a sound disposition of mind," said a bench comprising of Justices S B Sinha and Markandey Katju.

The case involved the Will of Umeshchandra Joshi, owner of Ramtirth Brahmi Hair Oil company, who had seven sons and three daughters but he had bequeathed all his property on his second son, depriving the rest.

The will was drafted in the ICU of a hospital where he was undergoing treatment. He was being treated by a doctor who was a student of the beneficiary. The will was executed in the presence of two witnesses who were also close to the beneficiary.

Family members who were deprived questioned the genuineness of the Will and accused the beneficary of playing fraud on family members.

Raising suspicion on the cirumstances surrounding the will a division Judge Bench of High Court held that the witnesses to the will are interested persons, and evidence adduced in support of execution of the will was unsatifactory.

Upholding the verdict of High Court, the Supreme Court also took notice of the meticulously drafted bill and held "When he was admitted in ICU, he would not be permitted to carry documents. It is unnatural that he would remember all the detail of his assets."

"An inference can, therefore, be safely drawn that Appellant (Beneficiary) had a role to play in execution of the will," the bench held.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting