Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
From the Courts »
 Shri Sanjeev Gupta, City Hospital and Maternity Home, Nursing Home Site 2, Opp. Sagar Cinema, Sector 16, Faridabad, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad.
 Orange Business Services India Solutions Pvt. Ltd, (earlier known as Equant Solutions India Pvt. Ltd) Vs. DCIT, Circle-3, Gurgaon
 Ved Parkash Bharti, S/o. Shri Parmanand, H. No. 1049-50, Sector-13-17, HUDA, Panipat Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Karnal
 Itochu Corporation, 5-1, Kita-Aoyama, 2 Chome, Minato-Ku Vs. ACIT (International Taxation), Circle 2(1)(1) New Delhi.
 No Tax applicable on Securities Premium even if used to set off losses: ITAT deletes addition against Hindustan Coca Cola
 Bertelsmann Marketing Services India Pvt. Ltd, 215, Second Floor, Suneja Tower-II, District Centre, Janakpuri, New Delhi Vs. DCIT, Circle-4(2), New Delhi
 DIT vs. Autodesk Asia Pvt Ltd (Karnataka High Court)
 Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) New Delhi vs ACIT (Intl. Taxation), Circle 2(1)(2) Room NO. 310 3rd Floor, Block 2, Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, Civic Centre, New Delhi,
 Gunjan Garg, C/o. Raj Kumar & Associates CA, L-7A(LGF) South Exten. Part-II, New Delhi Vs. Pr. CIT-16, Room No. 101, Drum Shape Building, New Delhi
 SMT. SHANTI DEVI MERWAH, A-26, FIRST FLOOR, KIRTI NAGAR, NEW DELHI Vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI
 Tax department cannot block import export code (IEC): Bombay High Court
 Shri Rohtash Singh, L 32/5, DLF Phase II, Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Circle 2, Gurgaon
 Shri Rohtash Singh, L 32/5, DLF Phase-II, Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Circle 2, Gurgaon
 Shri Satish Kumar, B 6/17, Main Wali Nagar, New Delhi vs ACIT, Circle 42(1), New Delhi.
 BMR Polymers (P) Ltd. Flat No. 42, Bank Apartments, Plot No. 22, Sector-4, Dwarka, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward-1(3) Gurgaon, Haryana

Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) New Delhi vs ACIT (Intl. Taxation), Circle 2(1)(2) Room NO. 310 3rd Floor, Block 2, Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, Civic Centre, New Delhi,
November, 18th 2020

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 6/4/2017 passed by CIT(A)- 43, for Assessment Year 2012-13.

2. The grounds of appeal are as under:-

Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellant respectfully submits:

1. “That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld C1T(A) has erred in upholding the assessment order passed by Ld AO under section 143(3) for the subject year wherein the income was assessed at Rs. 71,21,390 as against NIL returned income declared by the appellant and is liable to be quashed.

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting