Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Genpact India Pvt. Ltd Gurgaon-122002, Haryana Vs. DCIT Circle-10(1) New Delhi
November, 04th 2020

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 28/12/2011 passed by CIT(A)- 37, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2008-09.

That on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the Hon'ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ('CIT(A)')/Ld. AO is bad in law

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, while acknowledging that the assessment proceedings undertaken by the Ld. AO were not in accordance with the scheme of Section 144C of the Act and considering that the assessment order giving effect to DRP directions was not passed within the permitted time period, the Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in not explicitly quashing the impugned assessment proceedings, being void ab initio.

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting