Tally for Practicing CAs Gold Edition (Multi User) Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
From the Courts »
 Dissenting states likely to accept GST solution
 Shri Aftab Ahmed Zaki Ahmed, 5807, Main Sadar Bazar, 5807, Main Sadar Bazar, Delhi Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Range-63, New Delhi. New Delhi.
 Shri Aman Mehtani, H.No.73, National H.No.73, National Cooperative Society, Cooperative Society, Baner Road, Baner Road, Pune. Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Faridabad.
 Ms. Renu Sharma, WZ-163, 2nd Floor, Hastsal Road, A- Hastsal Road, A-Block, Uttam Nagar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-44(2), New Delhi.
 MUFG Bank Ltd, 5 th Floor, Worldmark 2, Asset 8, Aerocity, NH 8, New Delhi Vs. ACIT (International Taxation), Circle 2(2)(1), New Delhi
 Tax Rates specified in DTAA in respect of Dividend must prevail over DDT: ITAT
 ACIT, Central Circle-20, New Delhi Vs. M/s. Micromax Informatics Ltd.,90B, Sector 18, Gurgaon, Haryana
 Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., TEC, Level-18, DLF Cyber City, Phase III, Building No.5, Haryana Vs. ACIT, Special Range 6, New Delhi
 M/s Board & Paper Laminators E-7, 2nd Floor CC Colony Rana Pratap Bagh New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-36(5), New Delhi
 DCIT, Circle 6(2), New Delhi. Vs. Continental Device India Pvt. Ltd., C-120, Naraina Industrial Area, New Delhi.
 Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt.Ltd., 11th Floor, Building 10, Tower-C, DLF Cyber City, Phase-II, Gurgaon Vs. The DCIT, Circle-II, Gurgaon

Norma India Ltd. X-43, Loha Mandi Naraina New Delhi 110028 Vs. DCIT Circle 18 (2) New Delhi
November, 14th 2019
                 DELHI BENCH `E', NEW DELHI


                        ITA No.2680/Del/2017
                      Assessment Year: 2012-13
     Norma India Ltd.            Vs. DCIT
     X-43, Loha Mandi                Circle ­ 18 (2)
     Naraina                         New Delhi
     New Delhi ­ 110028
     PAN No. AAACN4323J
     (APPELLANT)                     (RESPONDENT)

     Appellant by                      Sh. Anuj Gupta, CA
     Respondent by                     Ms.Rakhi Bimal, Sr. DR.

     Date of hearing:                  11/11/2019
     Date of Pronouncement:            14/11/2019


        This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the
order dated 13.02.2017 of the CIT(A)-38, New Delhi relating to
A.Y. 2012-13.
2.      Although a number grounds have been raised by the
assessee in the grounds of appeal, these all relate to the order of
the CIT(A) in confirming the various additions made by the AO in
the exparte order passed by her.
3.      Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a
company engaged         in    the   business   of   manufacturing   and
exporting mainly flanges and carbon steel forging machines. It
filed its return of income on 25.09.2012 declaring total income of
Rs.14,26,32,619/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143
(3) of the Act on 31.03.2015 determining the total income at
Rs.14,37,19,531/- wherein he made addition of Rs.10,86,912/-
on account of disallowance out of repair and maintenance
expenses. Since none appeared before the CIT(A) despite notice
issued to the assessee, the Ld. CIT(A) in her exparte order
confirmed the addition made by the AO.
4.     Aggrieved with such exparte order of the CIT(A), the
assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
5. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides and perused the orders of the authorities below. We find the AO in the instant case disallowed an amount of Rs.10,86,912/- out of the repairs and maintenance expenses. We find in appeal the Ld. CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the AO as none appeared before her despite opportunity granted. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that given an opportunity, the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case before the CIT(A). Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) without seeking any adjournment under any pretext failing which the Ld. CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly the Page | 2 grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purpose.
6. In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 14.11.2019. Sd/- Sd/- (K. NARSIMHA CHARY) (R.K PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER *Neha* Date:- 14.11.2019 Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Date of dictation 11.11.2019 Date on which the typed draft is placed before the dictating 11.11.2019 Member Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 14.11.2019 Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating 14.11.2019 Member for Pronouncement Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr. PS/ PS 14.11.2019 Date on which the final order is uploaded on the website of 14.11.2019 ITAT Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 14.11.2019 Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. The date on which file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order Date of dispatch of the Order Page | 3
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting