Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Ms. Simran Hoon C/o S.J.B. Relan, Chartered Accountant 901, Vikram Tower, 16, Rajendra Place, Vs. DCIT Circle-3 New Delhi.
November, 06th 2019
             INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
               DELHI BENCH "B": NEW DELHI

                      BEFORE
      SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                        AND
     SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                     ITA No. 3188/Del/2016
                       Asstt. Year: 2012-13

       Ms. Simran Hoon             Vs. DCIT
       C/o S.J.B. Relan,               Circle-3
       Chartered Accountant            New Delhi.
       901, Vikram Tower, 16,
       Rajendra Place,
       New Delhi-110008
       PAN AACPH5452K
       (Appellant)                     (Respondent)



          Assessee by:      Shri S.K.Jain, CA
          Department by :   None
          Date of Hearing   05/11/2019
          Date of            05/11/2019
          pronouncement


                            ORDER

PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM:

     This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against

order dated 31.3.2016 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income

Tax (Appeals) ­I, Noida {CIT (A) for Assessment Year 2012-13. The

appeal challenges the order of the Ld. CIT (A) in which he has
                                                 ITA No. 3188/Del/2016
                                             Ms. Simran Hoon vs DCIT


confirmed addition of Rs. 41,59,405/- on account of discrepancy

between the income shown as per the income tax return and the

receipts as per Form 26AS ex parte qua the assessee.

2.     None was present on behalf of the department when the

appeal was called out for hearing. However, an application has

been     received   on   behalf   of   the   Senior       Departmental

Representative Shri S.N. Meena in which he has sought

adjournment. We note with displeasure that the Ld. Sr. DR has

not found time to be present before this court and has sought

adjournment through an application without specifying the

reason for his absence. The Ld. CIT (DR) Shri S.K. Jain expressed

his lack of knowledge about the whereabouts of Ld. Sr. DR.

Therefore, taking a strong exception to the absence of the Ld. Sr.

DR before this court, we proceed to hear the appeal of the

assessee ex parte qua the department.
3. A perusal of the order of the Ld. First appellate authority shows that the assessee was not present before the Ld. CIT (A) during the first appellate proceedings and the Ld. CIT (A) has confirmed the addition without going into the merits of the case. Therefore, in the interest of substantial justice, it is our considered opinion that the assessee should be given another 2 ITA No. 3188/Del/2016 Ms. Simran Hoon vs DCIT opportunity to present its case before the Ld. CIT (A). However, this opportunity is being given subject to the assessee depositing Rs. 5,000/- with the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund on or before 30th November, 2019. The assessee is further directed to be represented before the Ld. First Appellate Authority on or before 6th February, 2020 along with proof of depositing Rs. 5,000/- towards the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund and also a copy of this order. The Ld. CIT (A) shall grant adequate opportunity to the assessee to present her case and thereafter pass the order in accordance with law. 4. In the final result the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 5th November, 2019. sd/- sd/- (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 05/11/2019 Veena Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 3 ITA No. 3188/Del/2016 Ms. Simran Hoon vs DCIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi 4
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting